Skip to content

Conversation

@BenBaryoPX
Copy link
Contributor

This pull request improves the handling of identifier references in the mapIdentifierRelations function and enhances test coverage for identifier resolution in parsing tests.

Improvements to identifier reference handling:

  • src/flast.js: Updated the mapIdentifierRelations function to combine references from both scope.references and scope.variableScope.references into a single array, ensuring more comprehensive mapping of identifier relations.

Enhancements to test coverage:

  • tests/parsing.test.js: Modified the test case for verifying identifier references to include a more complex switch statement with a case block, improving the robustness of the test.

@BenBaryoPX BenBaryoPX requested a review from Copilot May 22, 2025 10:09
@BenBaryoPX BenBaryoPX self-assigned this May 22, 2025
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR fixes the handling of identifier references in the mapIdentifierRelations function and enhances testing of identifier resolution.

  • Merge references from both scope.references and scope.variableScope.references in src/flast.js
  • Enhance testing by updating the parsing test with a switch-case structure in tests/parsing.test.js

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated no comments.

File Description
src/flast.js Merge identifier references arrays for improved mapping
tests/parsing.test.js Update test case to include a switch-case block for better coverage
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (2)

tests/parsing.test.js:113

  • [nitpick] The updated test case now covers a basic switch-case scenario. Consider adding tests with multiple cases and a default clause to further validate the identifier reference mapping.
const code = `let a = 1; switch(a) {case 1: a;}`;

src/flast.js:237

  • [nitpick] Consider adding an inline comment explaining the rationale for merging both scope.references and scope.variableScope.references to improve code maintainability.
const references = [...(scope.references || []), ...(scope.variableScope?.references || [])];

@BenBaryoPX BenBaryoPX merged commit fbd5d60 into main May 22, 2025
4 checks passed
@BenBaryoPX BenBaryoPX deleted the fix-references branch May 22, 2025 10:11
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants