-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
Description
🎯 Layer 1: Intent Parsing
What needs to be done?
Task Title:
Implement release workflow (build Docker images, deploy to staging)
Area: infra | Repos: infra/
Primary Goal:
Configure automated release workflow that builds Docker images for all HyperAgent services and deploys them to staging environment, enabling continuous delivery
User Story / Context:
As a DevOps engineer, I want an automated release workflow that builds Docker images and deploys to staging so that new releases can be tested in a production-like environment before production deployment
Business Impact:
Enables automated, reliable deployments with full audit trail. Supports Phase 1 Foundation goals for CI/CD and infrastructure automation. Critical for production readiness.
Task Metadata:
- Sprint: Sprint 3
- Related Epic/Project: GitHub Project 9 - Phase 1 Foundation
- Issue Type: Feature
- Area: Infra
- Related Documentation:
- Platform Blueprint - Complete platform specification
- System Architecture - Infrastructure design
- Execution Strategy - Deployment strategy
📚 Layer 2: Knowledge Retrieval
What information do I need?
Required Skills / Knowledge:
- DevOps/Infra (CI/CD, Docker, Kubernetes)
- Container orchestration
- Release management
Estimated Effort:
M (Medium - 3-5 days)
Knowledge Resources:
- Review
.cursor/skills/for relevant patterns (devops-engineer, github-actions-templates) - Check
.cursor/llm/docs/for implementation examples - Read Platform Blueprint:
docs/draft.md - Read System Architecture:
docs/planning/4-System-Architecture-Design.md - Read Execution Strategy:
docs/reference/spec/execute.md - Study tech docs / ADRs in
docs/adrs/directory - Review GitHub Actions workflows and Docker best practices
Architecture Context:
According to the Platform Blueprint, HyperAgent uses a microservice architecture with orchestrator, agent services, and core services. The release workflow will build Docker images for all services and deploy them to staging.
System Architecture Diagram:
graph TB
subgraph "CI/CD Pipeline"
GitHub[GitHub Actions]
Build[Docker Build]
Test[Test Suite]
Push[Push to Registry]
Deploy[Deploy to Staging]
end
subgraph "Container Registry"
Registry[Docker Registry<br/>GHCR/AWS ECR]
end
subgraph "Staging Environment"
K8s[Kubernetes Cluster]
Services[HyperAgent Services]
end
GitHub --> Build
Build --> Test
Test --> Push
Push --> Registry
Registry --> Deploy
Deploy --> K8s
K8s --> Services
Code Examples & Patterns:
GitHub Actions Workflow Example:
name: Release Workflow
on:
push:
branches: [main]
tags:
- 'v*'
jobs:
build-and-deploy:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
steps:
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Build Docker images
run: |
docker build -t hyperagent/orchestrator:${{ github.sha }} ./services/orchestrator
docker build -t hyperagent/spec-agent:${{ github.sha }} ./services/agent-spec
- name: Push to registry
run: |
docker push hyperagent/orchestrator:${{ github.sha }}
docker push hyperagent/spec-agent:${{ github.sha }}
- name: Deploy to staging
run: |
kubectl set image deployment/orchestrator \
orchestrator=hyperagent/orchestrator:${{ github.sha }} \
-n staging⚠️ Layer 3: Constraint Analysis
What constraints and dependencies exist?
Known Dependencies:
- Docker registry must be configured (GHCR or AWS ECR)
- Kubernetes cluster must be available for staging
- Service Dockerfiles must exist
- Kubernetes manifests must be configured (see issue Configure K8s overlays for development environment #237)
Technical Constraints:
Scope limited to release workflow for staging environment. Production deployment tracked separately.
Current Blockers:
None identified (update as work progresses)
Risk Assessment & Mitigations:
Risk of failed deployments breaking staging. Mitigation: Implement health checks, automatic rollback on failure, staging environment isolation.
Resource Constraints:
- Deadline: Mar 3–16 (Sprint 3)
- Effort Estimate: M (Medium - 3-5 days)
💡 Layer 4: Solution Generation
How should this be implemented?
Solution Approach:
Implement GitHub Actions workflow:
- Build Docker images for all services on push to main or version tags
- Run tests before building
- Tag images with commit SHA and version tags
- Push images to container registry (GHCR or AWS ECR)
- Deploy to staging Kubernetes cluster
- Run health checks and smoke tests
- Notify team on success/failure
Design Considerations:
- Follow established patterns from
.cursor/skills/devops-engineer - Maintain consistency with existing CI/CD configurations
- Consider build caching for faster builds
- Ensure proper image tagging and versioning
- Plan for testing and validation
- Support rollback on deployment failure
Acceptance Criteria (Solution Validation):
- Release workflow builds all service Docker images
- Images pushed to container registry successfully
- Automatic deployment to staging on main branch push
- Health checks and smoke tests run after deployment
- Rollback mechanism implemented
- Team notifications configured
- Documentation updated with workflow procedures
- Code reviewed and approved
📋 Layer 5: Execution Planning
What are the concrete steps?
Implementation Steps:
- Configure container registry (GHCR or AWS ECR)
- Create GitHub Actions workflow file
- Configure Docker build steps for each service
- Set up image tagging strategy
- Configure registry push steps
- Set up Kubernetes deployment steps
- Implement health checks and smoke tests
- Configure rollback mechanism
- Set up team notifications
- Test workflow end-to-end
- Document workflow procedures
- Code review and approval
Environment Setup:
Repos / Services:
- Infra / IaC repo:
hyperagent/infra/ - Container registry: GHCR or AWS ECR
- Staging Kubernetes cluster
Required Environment Variables:
DOCKER_REGISTRY=(Container registry URL)KUBECONFIG=(Kubernetes cluster configuration)REGISTRY_USERNAME=(Registry authentication)REGISTRY_PASSWORD=(Registry authentication)
Access & Credentials:
- Container registry access: GitHub secrets or AWS credentials
- Kubernetes cluster access: kubeconfig file
- Access request: Contact @devops or project lead
✅ Layer 6: Output Formatting & Validation
How do we ensure quality delivery?
Ownership & Collaboration:
- Owner: @JustineDevs
- Reviewer: @ArhonJay
- Access Request: @JustineDevs or @ArhonJay
- Deadline: Mar 3–16 (Sprint 3)
- Communication: Daily stand-up updates, GitHub issue comments
Quality Gates:
- Code follows project style guide (see
.cursor/rules/rules.mdc) - All tests pass (unit, integration, e2e)
- No critical lint/security issues
- Documentation updated (README, workflow docs)
- Meets all acceptance criteria from Layer 4
- Follows production standards (see
.cursor/rules/production.mdc)
Review Checklist:
- Code review approved by @ArhonJay
- CI/CD pipeline passes (GitHub Actions)
- Release workflow tested and verified
- Security scan passes (no critical vulnerabilities)
- Documentation complete and accurate
Delivery Status:
- Initial Status: To Do
- Progress Tracking: Use issue comments for updates
- Sign-off: Approved by @Hyperionkit on [YYYY-MM-DD]
- PR Link: [Link to merged PR(s)]
Related Issues:
- Implement PR CI workflow (lint, tests, contract checks, static analysis) #231: Implement PR CI workflow (lint, tests, contract checks, static analysis)
- Configure canary deployments and basic SLOs for core services #233: Configure canary deployments and basic SLOs for core services
- Configure K8s overlays for development environment #237: Configure K8s overlays for development environment
Documentation References:
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Type
Projects
Status