chore: upgradking biome, swc, types, vitest, and faker

[jaredwray]

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

• Followed the Contributing guidelines and Code of Conduct
• Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
chore: upgradking biome, swc, types, vitest, and faker

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request updates several development dependencies, including @biomejs/biome, @swc/core, and vitest, and moves @faker-js/faker from dependencies to devDependencies. Feedback was provided regarding a Node.js version compatibility issue introduced by the @faker-js/faker update and a version mismatch for @types/node relative to the project's engine requirements.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (0b2d2e3) to head (f32147d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #127   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            8         8           
  Lines          477       477           
  Branches        95        95           
=========================================
  Hits           477       477           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.