Skip to content

Remove "Other types of resource MUST NOT have foo" #2425

@azaroth42

Description

@azaroth42

These restrictions go against the design principle of "Define success, not failure". If some extension or experiment wants to put a property somewhere other than where it is currently expected, then we shouldn't forbid them from doing that.

Clients SHOULD ignore properties that they don't understand, but the MUST NOT would make it an error on the publisher's side.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions