You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Do acoustic monitoring and eBird observations agree on where a species occurs? Pick one suboscine species and compare the two data sources.
Where to start: Explore the CSV tables (occupancy / detection and the eBird checklist variables). Focus on the tabular outputs rather than re-running the R models.
What to share: A comparison (map or table) of detections by source for your chosen species, plus a note on where they disagree.
Share your analysis, questions and results about Tropical Rainforest Birds: Acoustic + eBird Distribution Models in this thread. New here? See the welcome post.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Ornithology · 8.3 GB · License: CC-BY-4.0
Automated acoustic monitoring data and eBird observations combined for distribution models of suboscine birds in southwestern Amazonia.
🔗 Dataset page · Zenodo record
Challenge
Do acoustic monitoring and eBird observations agree on where a species occurs? Pick one suboscine species and compare the two data sources.
Share your analysis, questions and results about Tropical Rainforest Birds: Acoustic + eBird Distribution Models in this thread. New here? See the welcome post.
All reactions