You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
~2.5 million insect images from citizen science platforms (AMI-GBIF) and 2,893 annotated images from global automated camera traps (AMI-Traps) for automated insect monitoring.
Automated insect monitoring depends on how balanced the training data is. Which taxa are over- or under-represented in the AMI annotations, and where were the images collected?
Where to start: Work from the annotation/metadata files inside the archive (read them from within the ZIP — don't extract everything). Count records per taxon and per location.
What to share: A ranked bar chart of taxa coverage and a comment on the sampling gaps you find.
Share your analysis, questions and results about Insect Identification in the Wild: The AMI Dataset in this thread. New here? See the welcome post.
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Entomology · 14.4 GB · License: MIT
~2.5 million insect images from citizen science platforms (AMI-GBIF) and 2,893 annotated images from global automated camera traps (AMI-Traps) for automated insect monitoring.
🔗 Dataset page · Zenodo record
Challenge
Automated insect monitoring depends on how balanced the training data is. Which taxa are over- or under-represented in the AMI annotations, and where were the images collected?
Share your analysis, questions and results about Insect Identification in the Wild: The AMI Dataset in this thread. New here? See the welcome post.
All reactions