Mdsplit to support ADFS (and potentially static MDQ)

[rhoerbe]

This is an unobtrusive extension for pyff to facilitate the generation of ADFS-compatible metadata, which can be consumed like a metadata aggregate conforming to SAMLMetaIOP. Requires the c14n fix provided in a previous PR.

Doc: see src/pyff/mdsplit.py and sccripts/pyff_mdsplit.py

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 85.536% when pulling f0f7b94 on identinetics:mdsplit into 063f0de on leifj:master.

[leifj]

The way I understand this it duplicates existing functions in pyFF - notably the store builtin which already stores metadata in one-entitydesciprtor-per-file. I am not going to add new cmdlines to pyFF just to wrap a particular class of pipelines.

[rhoerbe]

Maybe I did not understand how to achieve this with the builtin.

Am 13.07.2016 um 21:57 schrieb Leif Johansson notifications@github.com:

On 2016-07-13 21:47, Rainer Hörbe wrote:

This is an unobtrusive extension for pyff to facilitate the generation
of ADFS-compatible metadata, which can be consumed like a metadata
aggregate conforming to SAMLMetaIOP. Requires the c14n fix provided in a
previous PR.

Doc: see src/pyff/mdsplit.py and sccripts/pyff_mdsplit.py

This duplicates functionality that already exists in pyFF so I don't
think I'll merge it - at least not until I understand what this adds
beyond the existing store builtin.

—
You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #95 (comment), or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AEJaP6zRVtZeZMy_vwGZ8d1VFg5DtveBks5qVUMSgaJpZM4JLx77.

[coveralls]

Coverage remained the same at 85.536% when pulling f0f7b94 on identinetics:mdsplit into 063f0de on leifj:master.

[rhoerbe]

An example or doc how to create signed per-ed files would be good

[leifj]

Skickat från min iPhone

13 juli 2016 kl. 22:03 skrev Rainer Hörbe notifications@github.com:

An example or doc how to create signed per-ed files would be good

Signing each file is new but is a relatively simple pipe to write - possibly an extension to store. That pull request I would consider. I don't see the value of adding cmdline tools for this usecase though.

[leifj]

I will entertain a pull request that implements signing as an option to store but doesn't introduce a bunch of new and redundant cmdline tools.

[rhoerbe]

I might do this once I have a better understanding (or documentation) of the plumbing stuff. For the time being I will have to bear to work with the fork, which is doing the job.

[leifj]

On 2016-07-14 13:44, Rainer Hörbe wrote:

I might do this once I have a better understanding (or documentation) of
the plumbing stuff. For the time being I will have to bear to work with
the fork, which is doing the job.

Pipes are fully documented using pydoc.