Skip to content

Citation guidance in GitHub section may need more clarification #64

@egrace479

Description

@egrace479

I think it'd be useful to add a link to this bibtex to cff crosswalk, and clarifying the proper way to generate a conference paper citation (see also this note) would be good since most computer science projects are published in proceedings, not journals.

I'm debating breaking this into two templates (where the templates are directly linkable), similar to how we have two expandable templates for HF. That way they can copy the correct version and may think more about whether or not extra keys are needed. I have seen instances where the preferred-citation key just gets a copy of the repo citation, so it's not entirely clear that the text is being read in all cases.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    documentationImprovements or additions to documentationquestionFurther information is requested

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions