Skip to content

Conversation

@jorisdral
Copy link
Collaborator

The current snapshot format is only loosely established, so we add a more concrete snapshot format, which is more amenable to refactoring. This snapshot format is still temporary -- we will implement snapshots properly in a later package.

#426 is near to being ready, but it is currently still failing some tests related to snapshots. Establishing a snapshot format makes bug-hunting in the snapshot code easier.

The current snapshot format is only loosely established, so we add a more
concrete snapshot format, which is more amenable to refactoring. This snapshot
format is still temporary -- we will implement snapshots properly in a later
package.
Copy link
Collaborator

@dcoutts dcoutts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

So unless I missed anything, this is mostly just moving the interim impl of snapshots from .Internal (and .Config and .RunNumber) into .Snapshot. Which is fine.

@jorisdral jorisdral added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 14, 2024
@jorisdral jorisdral removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a manual request Oct 14, 2024
@jorisdral
Copy link
Collaborator Author

So unless I missed anything, this is mostly just moving the interim impl of snapshots from .Internal (and .Config and .RunNumber) into .Snapshot. Which is fine.

That, and the (interim) format of a snapshot is more explicit

@jorisdral jorisdral enabled auto-merge October 14, 2024 11:32
Copy link
Collaborator

@mheinzel mheinzel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That looks like a sensible improvement 👍

@jorisdral jorisdral added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 14, 2024
Merged via the queue into main with commit 23939c1 Oct 14, 2024
@jorisdral jorisdral deleted the jdral/snapshot-format branch October 14, 2024 12:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants