Skip to content

Conversation

@jorisdral
Copy link
Collaborator

@jorisdral jorisdral commented Jul 1, 2025

There are a few places where functions in the public API create a HasBlockIO for the user, but since #742 a HasBlockIO is no longer automatically closed when a session is closed. So in the public API, we have to be extra careful to close it the when the public API opens a HasBlockIO.

There are a few places where functions in the public API create a `HasBlockIO`
for the user, but since #742 when a session is closed the `HasBlockIO` it
contains does not get closed automatically anymore. So in the public API, we
have to be extra careful to do so when the public API opens a `HasBlockIO`.
Copy link
Collaborator

@dcoutts dcoutts left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@dcoutts dcoutts added this pull request to the merge queue Jul 3, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit 4f0fcc3 Jul 3, 2025
58 of 60 checks passed
@dcoutts dcoutts deleted the jdral/release-hasblockio branch July 3, 2025 12:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants