"type" reference in Relationship

[tiagopog]

Hi there,

I'm probably missing something, so I would like to know if there is any particular reason to grab the relation's type by:

@type = class_name.underscore.pluralize.to_sym

Instead of something like this:

@type = resource_klass._type.to_sym

IMHO it would make more sense to grab it from resource_klass than class_name in order to avoid incoherences such as:

Having this value for type at relationship member:

And this one at included member:

Thoughts?

[lgebhardt]

I don't remember why it was done this way. I'll blame coding without coffee. See if the PR works for you.

[tiagopog]

Awesome! Thanks @lgebhardt