Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on May 13, 2019. It is now read-only.

Jnapier2/DataAnalyticsDemoJerryRNapier

Repository files navigation

DataAnalyticsDemoJerryRNapier

Data Analytics Project, Anaconda Jupyter platform, Demo for ePortfolio. Final Project for 720 using Food Inspection Data from Chicago Data Portal This is a Python Jupyter Project using part of the Food Inspection Dataset from http://www.cityofchicago.org

This information is derived from inspections of restaurants and other food establishments in Chicago from January 1, 2010 to the present. Inspections are performed by staff from the Chicago Department of Public Health’s Food Protection Program using a standardized procedure. The results of the inspection are inputted into a database, then reviewed and approved by a State of Illinois Licensed Environmental Health Practitioner (LEHP). For descriptions of the data elements included in this set, go to http://bit.ly/tS9IE8

Inspiration- Chicago is where I work and hang out so it is good to have an idea of the safest places to eat.

*New information added: -Data element discriptions, -Percentage of each area code failed, -Percentage of area codes passed. -(a fun attempt at) Inspection type in relation to pass/fail over time at the end.

Here are the discriptions of the data eletments:

• Inspection date: This is the date the inspection occurred. A particular establishment is likely to have multiple inspections which are denoted by different inspection dates.

• Inspection type: An inspection can be one of the following types: canvass, the most common type of inspection performed at a frequency relative to the risk of the establishment; consultation, when the inspection is done at the request of the owner prior to the opening of the establishment; complaint, when the inspection is done in response to a complaint against the establishment; license, when the inspection is done as a requirement for the establishment to receive its license to operate; suspect food poisoning, when the inspection is done in response to one or more persons claiming to have gotten ill as a result of eating at the establishment (a specific type of complaint- based inspection); task-force inspection, when an inspection of a bar or tavern is done. Re-inspections can occur for most types of these inspections and are indicated as such.

• Results: An inspection can pass, pass with conditions or fail. Establishments receiving a ‘pass’ were found to have no critical or serious violations (violation number 1-14 and 15- 29, respectively). Establishments receiving a ‘pass with conditions’ were found to have critical or serious violations, but these were corrected during the inspection. Establishments receiving a ‘fail’ were found to have critical or serious violations that were not correctable during the inspection. An establishment receiving a ‘fail’ does not necessarily mean the establishment’s licensed is suspended. Establishments found to be out of business or not located are indicated as such.

• Violations: An establishment can receive one or more of 45 distinct violations (violation numbers 1-44 and 70). For each violation number listed for a given establishment, the requirement the establishment must meet in order for it to NOT receive a violation is noted, followed by a specific description of the findings that caused the violation to be issued.

•Type of facility: Each establishment is described by one of the following: bakery, banquet hall, candy store, caterer, coffee shop, day care center (for ages less than 2), day care center (for ages 2 – 6), day care center (combo, for ages less than 2 and 2 – 6 combined), gas station, Golden Diner, grocery store, hospital, long term care center(nursing home), liquor store, mobile food dispenser, restaurant, paleteria, school, shelter, tavern, social club, wholesaler, or Wrigley Field Rooftop.

• Risk category of facility: Each establishment is categorized as to its risk of adversely affecting the public’s health, with 1 being the highest and 3 the lowest. The frequency of inspection is tied to this risk, with risk 1 establishments inspected most frequently and risk 3 least frequently.

Zipcodes featured in dataset.

60607 - New Area/Work Area

60610 - Old Work Area

60622 - Old Home Area

Questions-

Which area code has the higest risks?

Pass and fail per area?

Violations and inspections per area codes?

About

Data Analytics Project, Anaconda Jupyter platform, demo for ePortfolio.

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published