Validate Codex 0.131 and 0.132 CLI compatibility#94
Conversation
|
codex/review-gate state
|
|
@codex review Note This workflow is requesting a Codex generative AI review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: ec70efb04f
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
ec70efb to
3901978
Compare
|
@codex review Note This workflow is requesting a Codex generative AI review. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codex Review
Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.
Reviewed commit: 3901978e45
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub
Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
- Open a pull request for review
- Mark a draft as ready
- Comment "@codex review".
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.
When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".
3901978 to
ea29650
Compare
|
@codex review Note This workflow is requesting a Codex generative AI review. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy! ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubCodex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback". |
ea29650 to
a84321d
Compare
|
@codex review Note This workflow is requesting a Codex generative AI review. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Breezy! ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubCodex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback". |
Extend the soft validated Codex CLI range through 0.132.x, add doctor coverage for the accepted range, and keep future versions warning by default. Update live fresh-foreground wrappers to allocate a PTY for Codex 0.132 TUI startup guards, feature-detect Linux script exit-status support, detect unexpected foreground exits, record the real foreground Codex PID for teardown, and suppress TUI output from test stdout pipes. Co-authored-by: Codex (model=GPT-5) <codex@openai.com>
a84321d to
8972047
Compare
|
@codex review Note This workflow is requesting a Codex generative AI review. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Hooray! ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubCodex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback". |
|
@codex review Note This workflow is requesting a Codex generative AI review. |
|
Codex Review: Didn't find any major issues. Already looking forward to the next diff. ℹ️ About Codex in GitHubCodex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you
If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍. When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback". |
Note
This PR is purely generated by LLM: OpenAI Codex (GPT-5.5 (reasoning xhigh, summaries auto)).
Summary
0.130.xto0.130.x-0.132.x.codex doctorcoverage for accepted 0.130/0.131/0.132 versions and keep future 0.133+ versions warning by default.Validation
cargo test --lockedcargo test --locked doctor_cli -- --nocaptureCBTH_RUN_LIVE_CODEX_E2E=1 cargo test --test live_smoke -- --ignored --nocaptureCBTH_RUN_LIVE_TRUSTED_ALL_E2E=1 cargo test --test live_trusted_all -- --ignored --nocaptureCBTH_RUN_LIVE_NEW_THREAD_E2E=1 cargo test --test live_new_thread -- --ignored --nocaptureCBTH_RUN_LIVE_TASK_SUPERVISOR_E2E=1 cargo test --test live_task_supervisor -- --ignored --nocapturecargo fmt --all -- --checkcargo clippy --locked --all-targets -- -D warningsgit diff --checkuv run python /Users/hoteng/.codex/personal-sync/releases/dcb64bf00f2f3d3b2c78edf69dc00c87c416ad9c/personal_codex/skills/project-journal/scripts/project_journal.py validate --repo /Users/hoteng/.codex/worktrees/37fd/codex-background-task-handlerReview Tracking
github-codex-review: clean on head897204709d12f9377ec52a0ed67f2d2c3d912f36;codex/review-gatecompleted successfully with "Codex completion observed and current head has no Codex findings", and all Codex review threads are resolved.independent-codex-pr-review: clean on PR Validate Codex 0.131 and 0.132 CLI compatibility #94 plus local checkout ranged58400f259f94c7d0fb9a645592ff90379d5188b..897204709d12f9377ec52a0ed67f2d2c3d912f36; final artifact saysLGTM; no actionable findings.offline-frozen-diff-review: clean on frozen ranged58400f259f94c7d0fb9a645592ff90379d5188b..897204709d12f9377ec52a0ed67f2d2c3d912f36; defaultcodex-reviewwas unavailable due readonly git shim rejection ofgit -c, andcodex-readonlyfallback final artifact saysLGTM.