Skip to content

Conversation

@simeonschaub
Copy link
Member

Just discovered we were missing these, can't think of any reason not to define them.

Copy link
Member

@oxinabox oxinabox left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Co-authored-by: Lyndon White <oxinabox@ucc.asn.au>

# TODO: uncomment this once https://github.com/JuliaLang/julia/issues/35516
# @test haskey(Composite{Tuple{Float64}}(2.0), 1) == true
# @test hasproperty(Composite{Tuple{Float64}}(2.0), 2) == false
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be better to use test_broken, so we get notified when this is starts working?

@simeonschaub simeonschaub merged commit 6ed6806 into JuliaDiff:master Nov 16, 2020
@simeonschaub simeonschaub deleted the sds/haskey_composite branch November 16, 2020 22:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants