Update badges to show build status and coverage now we use GithubActions #303
Conversation
nickrobinson251
commented
Feb 10, 2021
nickrobinson251
commented
- noticed these were out of date when reviewing make Julia nightly CI a separate workflow #302
|
|
||
| [](https://travis-ci.org/JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl) | ||
| [](https://coveralls.io/github/JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl?branch=master) | ||
| [](https://juliaci.github.io/NanosoldierReports/pkgeval_badges/report.html) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
i added this one a while ago, so we could see if we pass on Julia Nightly version (without running it ourselves as part of the daily cron job), but AFAIK no one ever looks at it and it just means we occassionally have a "failing" badge on the README (which isn't great).
If anyone thinks we should keep the PkgEval let me know
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I personally like being able to tell at first first glance whether I can expect a package to work on Julia master, but I will admit that I am probably not that representative of the average user, so I don't really care.
| [](https://travis-ci.org/JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl) | ||
| [](https://coveralls.io/github/JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl?branch=master) | ||
| [](https://juliaci.github.io/NanosoldierReports/pkgeval_badges/report.html) | ||
| [](https://github.com/JuliaDiff/ChainRulesCore.jl/actions?query=workflow:CI) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
workflows/CI/badge.svg (linking to actions?query=workflow:CI) so that we're green if the CI action passes (i.e. ignore the JuliaNightly action)
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #303 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 89.39% 85.92% -3.48%
==========================================
Files 13 13
Lines 462 412 -50
==========================================
- Hits 413 354 -59
- Misses 49 58 +9
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
|
