Conversation
pxl-th
approved these changes
Aug 2, 2023
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am trying to add similar macro to AMDGPU as it exists in CUDA.jl, CUDA.@sync.
One reason is that AMDGPU currently returns following for
AMDGPU.@sync:which seems to be a different then expected behaviour.
Trying to implement the macro, getting inspiration from CUDA.jl, I am facing some issues, namely:
import Base: @syncwhich does not seems to be needed in CUDA.jlquoteshould not rather be in following order such that one syncs afterret:The MWE I am trying the syncing on is following
Note that the correct behaviour can be obtained by commenting the
AMDGPU.@syncmacro and syncing after the kernel withAMDGPU.synchronize(or syncing the specific stream), The expected performance on MI250x is:while erroneous perf would return e.g.