Conversation
|
@zygmuntszpak Given #25 (comment) would it be okay to register the package? |
|
Absolutely. Thank you very much for getting it into the right state. |
| Interpolations = ">= 0.7.3" | ||
| StaticArrays = ">= 0.7.0" | ||
| julia = "1" | ||
| julia = "1.3" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm going to revert this to julia = "1.0" as I don't see any hard requirements not compatible to Julia 1.0.
We have plans to switch to julia = "1.6" when that's released. JuliaImages/Images.jl#824 (comment)
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| [deps] | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought this was unstable when I read the docs.
https://julialang.github.io/Pkg.jl/v1/creating-packages/#Test-specific-dependencies-in-Julia-1.2-and-above-1
The exact interaction betweenProject.toml,test/Project.tomland their corresponding Manifest.tomls are not fully worked out, and may be subject to change in future versions. The old method of adding test-specific dependencies, described in the next section, will therefore be supported throughout all Julia 1.X releases.
But yeah, it works and works now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, I get it, this requires Julia 1.2.
I'll revert this, too. Just to keep Julia 1.0 compat. (Though it might be no one using it 😢 )
| #Technology. May 2009. =# | ||
| img1 = load("demo/table1.jpg") | ||
| img2 = load("demo/table2.jpg") | ||
| demo = joinpath(dirname(pathof(ImageTracking)), "..", "demo") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
FYI, a simpler version is possible in Julia 1.5: joinpath(pkgdir(ImageTracking), "demo")
3 participants
I would be interested in seeing ImageTracking tagged and registered. When trying it out earlier today I noticed that the README was quite directly runnable.