Skip to content

Conversation

@geoffroyleconte
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Here are the
demos-results

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 88.88% and project coverage change: +1.09 🎉

Comparison is base (0cae69e) 58.10% compared to head (1724fb0) 59.19%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #95      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.10%   59.19%   +1.09%     
==========================================
  Files          11       11              
  Lines        1222     1223       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          710      724      +14     
+ Misses        512      499      -13     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/LMTR_alg.jl 88.60% <83.33%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
src/LM_alg.jl 89.10% <100.00%> (-0.65%) ⬇️

... and 2 files with indirect coverage changes

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Here are the
demos-results

@geoffroyleconte
Copy link
Member Author

@dpo can I merge this PR?

src/LMTR_alg.jl Outdated

local l_bound, u_bound
if has_bounds(nls)
if (has_bounds(nls) || subsolver == TRDH)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could you add a new bool variable treats_bounds = has_bounds(nls) || subsolver == TRDH?

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Here are the
demos-results

@geoffroyleconte geoffroyleconte merged commit 899038e into JuliaSmoothOptimizers:master May 31, 2023
@geoffroyleconte geoffroyleconte deleted the lm-lmtr-trdh branch May 31, 2023 19:28
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Here are the
demos-results

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants