Skip to content

base this on AbstractTrees.jl #32

@nsajko

Description

@nsajko

It seems like it would make a lot of sense to base this package on the AbstractTrees.jl interface. That is, require users to implement the AbstractTrees.jl interface and any additional functions that are required after that. So some of the functions from this package could be made internal, users wouldn't have to add any methods to those functions. That would enable more interoperability across the ecosystem. Also, TBH, I'm not sure if this package is even necessary given that AbstractTrees.jl already exists?

https://juliahub.com/ui/Packages/General/AbstractTrees

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions