Conversation
|
Note Other AI code review bot(s) detectedCodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review. 📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds a TaskExecutionType enum, exposes a task Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
autonumber
participant Scheduler
participant Task as Task(instance)
participant Func as TaskFunction
participant Logger
Scheduler->>Task: trigger scheduled run
alt Task.type == SKIP and Task.running == true
Task->>Logger: log "skipping, already running"
Scheduler-->>Task: exit (skipped)
else
Task->>Task: set running = true
Task->>Logger: log "start"
Task->>Func: invoke (await if promise)
Func-->>Task: result / error
Task->>Logger: log "complete" or "error"
Task->>Task: set running = false
Scheduler-->>Task: exit (finished)
end
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
Summary of ChangesHello @ikenxuan, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! 此拉取请求旨在增强定时任务的管理能力，通过引入可配置的执行策略，解决了任务并发执行可能导致的问题。现在，开发者可以为每个定时任务指定在上次执行尚未完成时，是允许其继续并发执行，还是跳过本次执行以避免资源冲突或数据不一致。 Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
审阅者指南为定时任务新增了可配置的执行策略，允许在「默认并发执行」和「运行中则跳过」两种策略之间进行选择，并将其贯穿到任务创建、类型定义以及调度器运行时行为中。 定时任务中新的跳过执行策略时序图sequenceDiagram
participant Scheduler
participant Task as TaskInstance
participant TaskFunction as TaskFunction
participant ErrorHandler
Scheduler->>Task: cron_trigger()
alt type is skip and running is true
Task->>Task: log [定时任务: 上一次任务未完成, 跳过本次执行]
Scheduler-->>Task: return
else default or not running
Task->>Task: running = true
Task->>Task: log [定时任务: 开始执行]
Task->>TaskFunction: fnc()
alt fnc returns Promise
TaskFunction-->>Task: Promise
Task->>Task: await Promise
else fnc returns non Promise
TaskFunction-->>Task: result
end
Task->>Task: log [定时任务: 执行完成]
end
rect rgb(230,230,230)
note over Task,ErrorHandler: 错误处理与清理
alt error thrown
Task->>ErrorHandler: taskStart(name, name, error)
ErrorHandler-->>Task: handled
end
Task->>Task: running = false
end
更新后的任务调度模型类图classDiagram
class TaskOptions {
<<interface>>
+string? name
+boolean? log
+string? type
}
class Task {
<<interface>>
+string name
+string cron
+Function fnc
+Log log
+Job? schedule
+string type
+boolean running
}
class task {
<<function>>
+Task task(string cron, Function fnc, TaskOptions options)
}
TaskOptions "1" --> "1" Task : configures
task --> Task : creates
class Log {
<<type>>
+void call(string message)
}
class Job {
<<type>>
}
Task o--> Job : schedule
Task o--> Log : log
任务执行策略决策流程图flowchart TD
A[触发定时任务] --> B{任务类型}
B -->|skip| C{running 为 true?}
B -->|default| E[设置 running 为 true 并执行 fnc]
C -->|yes| D[日志: 上一次任务未完成, 跳过本次执行]
C -->|no| E[设置 running 为 true 并执行 fnc]
E --> F[如果 fnc 返回 Promise 则等待]
F --> G[日志: 执行完成]
D --> H[结束]
G --> I[设置 running 为 false]
I --> H[结束]
文件级改动
提示与命令与 Sourcery 交互
自定义你的体验访问你的 控制面板 以：
获取帮助Original review guide in EnglishReviewer's GuideAdds a configurable execution strategy for scheduled tasks, allowing either default concurrent execution or a skip-when-running policy, and wires this through task creation, type definitions, and the scheduler runtime behavior. Sequence diagram for new skip execution strategy in scheduled taskssequenceDiagram
participant Scheduler
participant Task as TaskInstance
participant TaskFunction as TaskFunction
participant ErrorHandler
Scheduler->>Task: cron_trigger()
alt type is skip and running is true
Task->>Task: log [定时任务: 上一次任务未完成, 跳过本次执行]
Scheduler-->>Task: return
else default or not running
Task->>Task: running = true
Task->>Task: log [定时任务: 开始执行]
Task->>TaskFunction: fnc()
alt fnc returns Promise
TaskFunction-->>Task: Promise
Task->>Task: await Promise
else fnc returns non Promise
TaskFunction-->>Task: result
end
Task->>Task: log [定时任务: 执行完成]
end
rect rgb(230,230,230)
note over Task,ErrorHandler: Error handling and cleanup
alt error thrown
Task->>ErrorHandler: taskStart(name, name, error)
ErrorHandler-->>Task: handled
end
Task->>Task: running = false
end
Class diagram for updated task scheduling modelclassDiagram
class TaskOptions {
<<interface>>
+string? name
+boolean? log
+string? type
}
class Task {
<<interface>>
+string name
+string cron
+Function fnc
+Log log
+Job? schedule
+string type
+boolean running
}
class task {
<<function>>
+Task task(string cron, Function fnc, TaskOptions options)
}
TaskOptions "1" --> "1" Task : configures
task --> Task : creates
class Log {
<<type>>
+void call(string message)
}
class Job {
<<type>>
}
Task o--> Job : schedule
Task o--> Log : log
Flow diagram for task execution policy decisionflowchart TD
A[Trigger scheduled task] --> B{Task type}
B -->|skip| C{running is true?}
B -->|default| E[Set running true and execute fnc]
C -->|yes| D[Log: 上一次任务未完成, 跳过本次执行]
C -->|no| E[Set running true and execute fnc]
E --> F[Await fnc if Promise]
F --> G[Log: 执行完成]
D --> H[End]
G --> I[Set running false]
I --> H[End]
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey - 我在这里给出了一些总体反馈：
- 在调度已有任务（
pkgCache）时，建议对新增的type和running属性做规范化处理（例如，如果缺失则将type默认设为'default'，running默认设为false），这样就不需要依赖它们只能通过task()帮助函数初始化，同时也能提升对旧任务定义的向后兼容性。
给 AI Agents 的提示
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- When scheduling existing tasks (`pkgCache`), consider normalizing the new `type` and `running` properties (e.g., defaulting `type` to `'default'` and `running` to `false` if they are missing) to avoid relying on them being initialized only via the `task()` helper and improve backward compatibility with older task definitions.帮我变得更有用！请在每条评论上点 👍 或 👎，我会根据你的反馈改进后续评审。
Original comment in English
Hey - I've left some high level feedback:
- When scheduling existing tasks (
pkgCache), consider normalizing the newtypeandrunningproperties (e.g., defaultingtypeto'default'andrunningtofalseif they are missing) to avoid relying on them being initialized only via thetask()helper and improve backward compatibility with older task definitions.
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Overall Comments
- When scheduling existing tasks (`pkgCache`), consider normalizing the new `type` and `running` properties (e.g., defaulting `type` to `'default'` and `running` to `false` if they are missing) to avoid relying on them being initialized only via the `task()` helper and improve backward compatibility with older task definitions.Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
![gemini-code-assist[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/956858?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
|
你可以通过以下命令安装该版本： |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
packages/core/src/core/karin/task.tspackages/core/src/plugin/admin/load.tspackages/core/src/types/plugin/task.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
packages/core/src/plugin/admin/load.ts (1)
packages/core/src/core/internal/error.ts (1)
errorHandler(65-72)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: Sourcery review
- GitHub Check: publish-temp
🔇 Additional comments (7)
packages/core/src/types/plugin/task.ts (2)
4-10: LGTM! Enum implementation addresses previous feedback.The TaskExecutionType enum provides type safety and eliminates magic strings, directly addressing the concern raised in the previous review. The values and documentation are clear.
28-35: LGTM! Type-safe task execution state tracking.The new
typeandrunningfields are well-documented and provide the necessary foundation for the skip-when-running behavior implemented elsewhere in the PR.packages/core/src/core/karin/task.ts (2)
2-2: LGTM! Correct import.The TaskExecutionType enum is properly imported for use in the task factory.
10-15: LGTM! Flexible type definition.The union type
TaskExecutionType | \${TaskExecutionType}`` allows both enum values and their string equivalents, providing flexibility for plugin authors.packages/core/src/plugin/admin/load.ts (3)
18-18: LGTM! Correct import.TaskExecutionType is properly imported for implementing the skip-when-running logic.
217-220: LGTM! Clear skip-when-running guard.The implementation correctly checks both the execution type and running state before skipping. The log message clearly communicates why the task was skipped.
222-231: LGTM! Proper running flag management with cleanup.The running flag is correctly set before execution and reliably reset in the finally block, ensuring cleanup even on errors.
Note on race conditions: While the check (line 217) and set (line 222) are not atomic, node-schedule typically executes jobs serially within Node.js's event loop, making concurrent execution unlikely. However, be aware that if cron intervals are extremely short or job execution is instantaneous, there's a theoretical window where multiple jobs could see
running = falsesimultaneously.
| type: (options.type as TaskExecutionType) || TaskExecutionType.DEFAULT, | ||
| running: false, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
# First, let's examine the file at the specified lines
cat -n packages/core/src/core/karin/task.ts | head -60Repository: KarinJS/Karin
Length of output: 1489
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for TaskExecutionType definition
rg -n "TaskExecutionType" packages/core/src/core/karin/task.ts -A 5 -B 2Repository: KarinJS/Karin
Length of output: 662
🏁 Script executed:
# Also search for the enum definition across the codebase
rg -n "enum TaskExecutionType\|type TaskExecutionType" --type=tsRepository: KarinJS/Karin
Length of output: 39
🏁 Script executed:
# Find the types directory and locate the task type definition
fd "task.ts" --type f -path "*/types/plugin/*"Repository: KarinJS/Karin
Length of output: 225
🏁 Script executed:
# Also search for TaskExecutionType definition
rg -n "TaskExecutionType" --type=ts -A 3 -B 1 | head -50Repository: KarinJS/Karin
Length of output: 2367
🏁 Script executed:
# Search for actual calls to the task() function to see usage patterns
rg -n "task\s*\(" --type-add='ts:*.ts' -t ts -B 2 -A 2 | head -100Repository: KarinJS/Karin
Length of output: 406
🏁 Script executed:
# Check the entire TaskExecutionType enum to see all values
cat -n packages/core/src/types/plugin/task.tsRepository: KarinJS/Karin
Length of output: 1001
Use a type guard instead of a type assertion.
TypeScript already restricts options.type to valid enum values via the TaskExecutionType | \${TaskExecutionType}`` type annotation, preventing arbitrary strings at compile time. However, the type assertion at line 43 removes this type information and accepts any value at runtime without validation. Replace the assertion with explicit type narrowing or a helper function to safely handle both enum and string inputs:
type: (typeof options.type === 'string'
? (options.type as TaskExecutionType)
: options.type) || TaskExecutionType.DEFAULTThis maintains type safety while making the intent clearer.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In packages/core/src/core/karin/task.ts around lines 43-44, the code uses a type
assertion for options.type which strips type safety; replace it with an explicit
type guard that checks options.type at runtime (e.g., typeof options.type ===
'string') and then safely maps/casts only when the check passes, otherwise use
the value as-is, with a fallback to TaskExecutionType.DEFAULT; optionally
extract this logic into a small helper function to keep the assignment concise
and maintain type safety.
1 participant
Summary by Sourcery
新功能：
Original summary in English
Summary by Sourcery
New Features:
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.