docs(specs): clarify kiloclaw compliance rules#2578
Open
jeanduplessis wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Open
docs(specs): clarify kiloclaw compliance rules#2578jeanduplessis wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
jeanduplessis wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Contributor
Code Review SummaryStatus: 1 Issues Found | Recommendation: Address before merge Overview
Issue Details (click to expand)WARNING
Other Observations (not in diff)Issues found in unchanged code that cannot receive inline comments:
Files Reviewed (2 files)
Fix these issues in Kilo Cloud Reviewed by gpt-5.4-20260305 · 1,435,153 tokens |
This was referenced Apr 18, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Clarifies KiloClaw billing and data-model specs so compliance work starts from consistent product rules.
Why this change is needed
Several confirmed compliance gaps were spec-authority problems rather than clear runtime bugs. Reviewers needed one source of truth for paid self-service funding rules, soft-delete behavior, bootstrap pairing requirements, and promo-code behavior before evaluating follow-on implementation PRs.
How this is addressed
payment_sourceandcredit_renewal_atfunding invariants to paid self-service rows.managed-activebootstrap rows outside those paid-row invariants until org billing ships.Verification
pnpm formatgit pushpassed repo hooksVisual Changes
N/A
Reviewer Notes
Human Reviewer
managed-activecarveouts match current intended product behavior and are narrow enough to stay temporary.Code Reviewer Agent
Code Reviewer Notes
- Only spec files changed: `.specs/kiloclaw-billing.md` and `.specs/kiloclaw-datamodel.md`. - This PR is stack root for follow-on implementation work. Review wording consistency, not runtime behavior. - Requirements covered here came from confirmed compliance findings plus product clarification that standalone Stripe checkout must keep promo-code support.