Add BrowserFS to overview's comparison.#324
Merged
leplatrem merged 1 commit intoKinto:masterfrom Dec 15, 2015
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
Thanks for taking the time to contribute :) |
leplatrem
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 15, 2015
Add BrowserFS to overview's comparison.
lavish205
pushed a commit
to lavish205/kinto
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 20, 2016
…ol-version Expose the protocol version in the root URL endpoint
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hello. I feel that BrowserFS contributes a lot to the offline-capable/offline-first world, and is an excellent piece of technology to compare Kinto against. I would like to see it added to Kinto's overview's comparison table.