I'm now realizing that I comically overscoped the set of features, even though, supposedly this language was quite simple. Will probably start a new one, even simpler, that I'll actually manage to implement

A tiny compiler I'm doing for educational purposes. It is pretty much C with even less features and hence even less usable.

Grammar, examples and stuff can be viewed in Refs/

Here is the current planned features list:

• Comically simple (read: barebones)
• Block based
• For some reason I made it look like Rust a lot
• Compiled language (will probably use NASM)
• I will indeed probably rethink this one, cuz otherwise the language isn't at all practical Only stack memory allocation, because pointers are too hard (may rethink)
• No type stuff besides primitives, arrays and structs (maybe unions as well?)

TODO:

• Implement all remaining keywords (return, free, for/from/to)
• Figure out pre-existing functions/constants (new, NULL, NONE, io)
• Start working on static analysis
• Rewrite the single literal parser (so that chained array dereferences/function indexation is possible)
• Add pointers (@)