chore(hygiene): bootstrap SECURITY, CHANGELOG, CONTRIBUTING, CODEOWNERS

[KooshaPari]

User description

Tier-2 hygiene bootstrap per audit #120. Adds all 4 missing hygiene files. Stack: Go + Rust (Tauri) + Node (SvelteKit).

---

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only changes that affect contribution process and review routing but do not alter runtime code paths.

Overview
Bootstraps repo hygiene by adding CHANGELOG.md, CONTRIBUTING.md, and SECURITY.md with initial scaffolding for release notes, contribution/quality-gate expectations, and vulnerability reporting/response timelines.

Adds a CODEOWNERS file to route all changes (and key language globs) to a default owner for review.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 414e406. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

---

CodeAnt-AI Description

Add starter security, contribution, changelog, and review ownership docs

What Changed

• Adds a security policy with private reporting options, covered scope, and response timelines
• Adds contributor guidance for branch naming, local checks, commit style, and repo rules
• Adds an initial changelog scaffold for tracking unreleased changes
• Adds a CODEOWNERS file so changes are routed to a default reviewer

Impact

✅ Clearer security reporting
✅ Faster contributor onboarding
✅ Consistent review routing

🔄 Retrigger CodeAnt AI Review

Details

💡 Usage Guide

Checking Your Pull Request

Every time you make a pull request, our system automatically looks through it. We check for security issues, mistakes in how you're setting up your infrastructure, and common code problems. We do this to make sure your changes are solid and won't cause any trouble later.

Talking to CodeAnt AI

Got a question or need a hand with something in your pull request? You can easily get in touch with CodeAnt AI right here. Just type the following in a comment on your pull request, and replace "Your question here" with whatever you want to ask:

@codeant-ai ask: Your question here

This lets you have a chat with CodeAnt AI about your pull request, making it easier to understand and improve your code.

Example

@codeant-ai ask: Can you suggest a safer alternative to storing this secret?

Preserve Org Learnings with CodeAnt

You can record team preferences so CodeAnt AI applies them in future reviews. Reply directly to the specific CodeAnt AI suggestion (in the same thread) and replace "Your feedback here" with your input:

@codeant-ai: Your feedback here

This helps CodeAnt AI learn and adapt to your team's coding style and standards.

Example

@codeant-ai: Do not flag unused imports.

Retrigger review

Ask CodeAnt AI to review the PR again, by typing:

@codeant-ai: review

Check Your Repository Health

To analyze the health of your code repository, visit our dashboard at https://app.codeant.ai. This tool helps you identify potential issues and areas for improvement in your codebase, ensuring your repository maintains high standards of code health.

[gemini-code-assist]

Warning

You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again!

[codeant-ai]

CodeAnt AI is reviewing your PR.

---

Thanks for using CodeAnt! 🎉

We're free for open-source projects. if you're enjoying it, help us grow by sharing.

Share on X ·
Reddit ·
LinkedIn

[codeant-ai]

🟠 Architect Review — HIGH

The Node local quality gate instructs contributors to use Bun or PNPM (bun install && bun run build or pnpm install && pnpm run build), while the SvelteKit frontend is explicitly configured to use Yarn (packageManager: "yarn@..." with a yarn.lock). This contradicts the actual project configuration and will mislead contributors about the supported package manager.

Suggestion: Update the Node quality gate to use the repo's configured primary package manager (Yarn, matching packageManager and yarn.lock), optionally documenting one consistent fallback if truly supported.

Fix in Cursor | Fix in VSCode Claude

(Use Cmd/Ctrl + Click for best experience)

Prompt for AI Agent 🤖

This is an **Architect / Logical Review** comment left during a code review. These reviews are first-class, important findings — not optional suggestions. Do NOT dismiss this as a 'big architectural change' just because the title says architect review; most of these can be resolved with a small, localized fix once the intent is understood.

**Path:** CONTRIBUTING.md
**Line:** 12:12
**Comment:**
	*HIGH: The Node local quality gate instructs contributors to use Bun or PNPM (`bun install && bun run build` or `pnpm install && pnpm run build`), while the SvelteKit frontend is explicitly configured to use Yarn (`packageManager: "yarn@..."` with a `yarn.lock`). This contradicts the actual project configuration and will mislead contributors about the supported package manager.

Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
If a suggested approach is provided above, use it as the authoritative instruction. If no explicit code suggestion is given, you MUST still draft and apply your own minimal, localized fix — do not punt back with 'no suggestion provided, review manually'. Keep the change as small as possible: add a guard clause, gate on a loading state, reorder an await, wrap in a conditional, etc. Do not refactor surrounding code or expand scope beyond the finding.
Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix

[codeant-ai]

🟠 Architect Review — HIGH

CONTRIBUTING.md directs contributors to AGENTS.md for "hub context", but no AGENTS.md file exists anywhere in the repository, leaving a dead reference in a core governance section.

Suggestion: Either add an AGENTS.md file with the intended hub context or remove/replace this reference with an existing, maintained document.

Fix in Cursor | Fix in VSCode Claude

(Use Cmd/Ctrl + Click for best experience)

Prompt for AI Agent 🤖

This is an **Architect / Logical Review** comment left during a code review. These reviews are first-class, important findings — not optional suggestions. Do NOT dismiss this as a 'big architectural change' just because the title says architect review; most of these can be resolved with a small, localized fix once the intent is understood.

**Path:** CONTRIBUTING.md
**Line:** 19:19
**Comment:**
	*HIGH: CONTRIBUTING.md directs contributors to `AGENTS.md` for "hub context", but no `AGENTS.md` file exists anywhere in the repository, leaving a dead reference in a core governance section.

Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
If a suggested approach is provided above, use it as the authoritative instruction. If no explicit code suggestion is given, you MUST still draft and apply your own minimal, localized fix — do not punt back with 'no suggestion provided, review manually'. Keep the change as small as possible: add a guard clause, gate on a loading state, reorder an await, wrap in a conditional, etc. Do not refactor surrounding code or expand scope beyond the finding.
Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix

[codeant-ai]

🟠 Architect Review — HIGH

The governance section states that a pre-commit hook runs trufflehog, but the repo contains no pre-commit configuration or hook scripts invoking trufflehog (only Git's default .sample hooks), so this documented security control does not actually exist.

Suggestion: Either add a real pre-commit hook configuration that runs trufflehog (e.g., via .pre-commit-config.yaml or a Husky hook) or reword the statement as a recommendation rather than an existing enforced hook.

Fix in Cursor | Fix in VSCode Claude

(Use Cmd/Ctrl + Click for best experience)

Prompt for AI Agent 🤖

This is an **Architect / Logical Review** comment left during a code review. These reviews are first-class, important findings — not optional suggestions. Do NOT dismiss this as a 'big architectural change' just because the title says architect review; most of these can be resolved with a small, localized fix once the intent is understood.

**Path:** CONTRIBUTING.md
**Line:** 20:20
**Comment:**
	*HIGH: The governance section states that a pre-commit hook runs trufflehog, but the repo contains no pre-commit configuration or hook scripts invoking trufflehog (only Git's default `.sample` hooks), so this documented security control does not actually exist.

Validate the correctness of the flagged issue. If correct, How can I resolve this? If you propose a fix, implement it and please make it concise.
If a suggested approach is provided above, use it as the authoritative instruction. If no explicit code suggestion is given, you MUST still draft and apply your own minimal, localized fix — do not punt back with 'no suggestion provided, review manually'. Keep the change as small as possible: add a guard clause, gate on a loading state, reorder an await, wrap in a conditional, etc. Do not refactor surrounding code or expand scope beyond the finding.
Once fix is implemented, also check other comments on the same PR, and ask user if the user wants to fix the rest of the comments as well. if said yes, then fetch all the comments validate the correctness and implement a minimal fix

[codeant-ai]

CodeAnt AI finished reviewing your PR.