refactor: decompose baedal function to reduce complexity

[KubrickCode]

• Extract handleNoClobberMode, handleSkipExistingMode, handleInteractiveMode functions
• Flatten 3-level nested conditionals to early return pattern
• Add 13 test cases in pull/index.spec.ts (verify function decomposition and early return pattern)

fix #74

[KubrickCode]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @KubrickCode, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request focuses on enhancing the maintainability and clarity of the baedal function by restructuring its internal logic. It extracts complex conditional branches into distinct, single-responsibility functions and adopts an early return strategy to simplify the overall control flow. The changes also introduce custom error types for more precise error reporting and are backed by a robust suite of new tests to ensure stability and correct behavior.

Highlights

• Function Decomposition: The core baedal function has been refactored by extracting its conflict resolution logic into three dedicated helper functions: handleNoClobberMode, handleSkipExistingMode, and handleInteractiveMode. This improves modularity and readability.
• Conditional Flattening: The previously 3-level nested conditional statements within baedal have been flattened into a more linear structure using an early return pattern, making the control flow easier to follow.
• Custom Error Handling: The pull request introduces and utilizes custom error types, FileSystemError and ValidationError, for more specific and descriptive error handling related to file system conflicts and user cancellations.
• Comprehensive Testing: Thirteen new test cases have been added in src/pkg/pull/index.spec.ts to thoroughly verify the correctness of the function decomposition, the new error handling, and the early return patterns implemented.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request is a good step towards improving the codebase by refactoring the baedal function to reduce its complexity. Extracting logic into separate handler functions and using an early return pattern significantly enhances readability and maintainability, aligning well with the repository's style guide. The introduction of custom error types (FileSystemError, ValidationError) instead of generic Error is also a valuable improvement for error handling. However, the review identified a few areas for improvement. There are some violations of the TypeScript coding conventions regarding function argument patterns and the placement of helper functions. More critically, the newly added test suite in pull/index.spec.ts needs substantial revision, as many tests are tautological and do not actually execute or validate the refactored code, undermining their purpose.

[KubrickCode]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request does a great job of refactoring the baedal function to reduce its complexity, adhering to the style guide's principles of single responsibility and limited nesting depth. The extraction of logic into handleNoClobberMode, handleSkipExistingMode, and handleInteractiveMode functions significantly improves readability. The switch to custom error types (FileSystemError, ValidationError) is also a good improvement for error handling.

My main feedback is regarding the new tests. While it's great that tests were added, they currently only verify that the custom error classes can be thrown, rather than testing the actual refactored logic within the baedal function. The test names are also a bit misleading. I've left some comments with suggestions to improve the tests by removing redundancy and I highly recommend adding true integration tests that cover the new code paths for each conflict mode. I've also included a couple of suggestions in src/pkg/pull/index.ts to further improve code consistency and readability.

[KubrickCode]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request does a great job of refactoring the baedal function to reduce its complexity, adhering to the repository's coding conventions about single-responsibility functions and limited nesting depth. The introduction of custom error types (FileSystemError, ValidationError) and the removal of magic strings are also excellent improvements.

My review includes a few suggestions:

• A fix for a bug in handleSkipExistingMode where it could return an incorrect list of files.
• A couple of changes to improve consistency in how conflict modes are handled.
• A recommendation to enhance the new test suite to cover the actual refactored logic, as the current tests only verify the custom error classes in isolation.

[KubrickCode]

/gemini review

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request refactors the baedal function to improve readability and reduce complexity by extracting logic into separate helper functions for different conflict resolution modes. This is a great improvement that aligns well with the repository's style guide. However, the newly added tests in src/pkg/pull/index.spec.ts do not actually test the refactored logic; they only verify the error classes by manually throwing them. This gives a false sense of security and should be corrected to perform proper integration testing of the baedal function's different modes. Additionally, there's a minor style guide violation regarding the alphabetical ordering of destructured properties.

[KubrickCode]

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.0.5 🎉

The release is available on:

• npm package (@latest dist-tag)
• GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀