Skip to content

fix(dashboard): use defined btn-outline for change-ownership Cancel button (NODE-4976)#418

Merged
GTC6244 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/node-4976-cancel-btn-outline
May 29, 2026
Merged

fix(dashboard): use defined btn-outline for change-ownership Cancel button (NODE-4976)#418
GTC6244 merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/node-4976-cancel-btn-outline

Conversation

@GTC6244
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@GTC6244 GTC6244 commented May 29, 2026

Summary

Follow-up to #417. The change-ownership modal's Cancel button used class="btn btn-secondary", but .btn-secondary isn't defined in styles.css (only .btn-primary, .btn-outline, .btn-danger exist), so it rendered without secondary styling. Switched to .btn-outline to match every other dashboard modal's Cancel button. Caught by Copilot review on #417 after it merged.

Test plan

  • Open the change-ownership modal (account dropdown → Change Ownership, ChainSecured account)
  • Confirm the Cancel button renders with the standard outline style, matching the Cancel buttons in other modals (add action, add key, billing, confirm-delete)

Linear: https://linear.app/litprotocol/issue/NODE-4976

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

…utton (NODE-4976)

`.btn-secondary` isn't defined in styles.css (only .btn-primary, .btn-outline,
.btn-danger exist), so the change-ownership modal's Cancel button got no
secondary styling. Every other dashboard modal's cancel button uses
.btn-outline — match that. Follow-up to #417 (caught by Copilot review after
merge).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@GTC6244 GTC6244 requested review from a team and Copilot May 29, 2026 15:38
@GTC6244 GTC6244 merged commit 21c7cf1 into main May 29, 2026
12 of 14 checks passed
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants