Fix rail_lephare smoke test

[ztq1996]

Problem & Solution Description (including issue #)

Code Quality

• My code follows the code style of this project
• I have written unit tests or justified all instances of #pragma: no cover; in the case of a bugfix, a new test that breaks as a result of the bug has been added
• My code contains relevant comments and necessary documentation for future maintainers; the change is reflected in applicable demos/tutorials (with output cleared!) and added/updated docstrings use the NumPy docstring format
• Any breaking changes, described above, are accompanied by backwards compatibility and deprecation warnings

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.75%. Comparing base (5203be5) to head (02ee880).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #199   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.75%   99.75%           
=======================================
  Files          47       47           
  Lines        3231     3231           
=======================================
  Hits         3223     3223           
  Misses          8        8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sschmidt23]

Looks like a notebook is failing the smoke test because it isn't properly finding the para file, this and #188 from RAIL look to fix that, approved.