style: fix lint warnings

[ReenigneArcher]

Description

Fixes lint warnings required after LizardByte/.github#488

Screenshot

Issues Fixed or Closed

Type of Change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Dependency update (updates to dependencies)
• Documentation update (changes to documentation)
• Repository update (changes to repository files, e.g. .github/...)

Checklist

• My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have added or updated the in code docstring/documentation-blocks for new or existing methods/components

[github-advanced-security]

This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.73%. Comparing base (5041b2a) to head (0c7b657).
⚠️ Report is 25 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #19   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.73%   62.73%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines         432      432           
=======================================
  Hits          271      271           
  Misses        161      161           

Flag	Coverage Δ
aarch64-apple-darwin	62.64% <ø> (ø)
aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu	62.50% <ø> (ø)
x86_64-apple-darwin	62.64% <ø> (ø)
x86_64-pc-windows-msvc	62.50% <ø> (ø)
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu	62.50% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
crates/server/src/auth.rs	49.12% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/certs.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/config.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/db/mod.rs	80.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/db/schema.rs	100.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/dependencies/mod.rs	66.66% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/globals.rs	58.82% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/logging/mod.rs	0.00% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/tray.rs	53.33% <ø> (ø)
crates/server/src/web/mod.rs	86.04% <ø> (ø)
... and 6 more

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud