Reviewed: 49c60da..03307f3 (2 commits)
Blockers: 0 | Majors: 0 | Minors: 0 | Nits: 1
- Reviewed range:
49c60da5611be873713af8e2c36819da373fa3f6..03307f3ce29c3966629278a1f2871b0d82b7e79a (2 commits, 2 files)
- Blockers: 0
- Majors: 0
- Minors: 0
- Nits: 1
- Counter-argument check:
03307f3.1 tested — section is labelled "Suggested", making it advisory brainstorm output that fits a spec; no tracking overhead is incurred. Counter holds for severity (retaining as [NIT] only), but the observation that items are invisible to the plan-tracking workflow stands; finding retained.
- Not reviewed: lockfiles, generated files,
examples/, prior daily-review docs (immutable snapshots, out of scope)
- Last reviewed SHA:
03307f3ce29c3966629278a1f2871b0d82b7e79a
2026-05-08 — 03307f3
Reviewed: 49c60da..03307f3 (2 commits)
Blockers: 0 | Majors: 0 | Minors: 0 | Nits: 1
[NIT]
docs/specs/2026-05-06-strategy-ai-modding-review.md:54— implementation task list in a spec file should live in a plan docdetails
Problem: Lines 54–67 enumerate four concrete implementation tasks under a "Suggested near-term implementation plan" heading inside a
docs/specs/fileWhy it matters: CLAUDE.md reserves
docs/plans/for "implementation roadmaps, chunked task lists"; items in specs won't receive✅ shippedmarkers or PR cross-links and will silently rot untrackedFix:
Or extract all four items into
docs/plans/2026-05-06-strategy-ai-modding-plan.mdso they can be linked to PRs and marked shipped.49c60da5611be873713af8e2c36819da373fa3f6..03307f3ce29c3966629278a1f2871b0d82b7e79a(2 commits, 2 files)03307f3.1tested — section is labelled "Suggested", making it advisory brainstorm output that fits a spec; no tracking overhead is incurred. Counter holds for severity (retaining as [NIT] only), but the observation that items are invisible to the plan-tracking workflow stands; finding retained.examples/, prior daily-review docs (immutable snapshots, out of scope)03307f3ce29c3966629278a1f2871b0d82b7e79a