Skip to content

Conversation

@jennaswa
Copy link
Contributor

From team reviews: “Manage helping with MDAKits who need assistance” is an unclear goal, and possibly an unrealistic one as the registry grows. We suggest rephrasing the responsibility to “offer input on MDAKit issues where possible” as a more realistic responsibility.

Relatedly, we will need to develop a post-EOSS4 plan to ensure the registry is maintained.

From team reviews: “Manage helping with MDAKits who need assistance” is an unclear goal, and possibly an unrealistic one as the registry grows. We suggest rephrasing the responsibility to “offer input on MDAKit issues where possible” as a more realistic responsibility.
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

w.r.t post-eoss4 plan, I have no idea.

@jennaswa
Copy link
Contributor Author

Adding listed team members as reviewers. Thanks, @IAlibay, for already chiming in!

Copy link
Member

@orbeckst orbeckst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With no funding for MDAKits at the moment, we have to cut back and I agree with @IAlibay that we should limit the amount of support we're committing to. However, I feel that removing any kind of support seems quite harsh so we should discuss here.

Copy link
Member

@orbeckst orbeckst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am ok with the reformulation.

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

@jennaswa could you please merge when you think that there've been sufficient 👀 on the PR?

@jennaswa jennaswa merged commit 186f626 into MDAnalysis:master Mar 24, 2025
1 check passed
@jennaswa jennaswa deleted the teams-mdakits branch March 24, 2025 18:24
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants