Skip to content

Initial commit#3

Merged
ehanson8 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
initial-commit
Oct 8, 2025
Merged

Initial commit#3
ehanson8 merged 2 commits intomainfrom
initial-commit

Conversation

@ehanson8
Copy link
Collaborator

@ehanson8 ehanson8 commented Oct 7, 2025

Purpose and background context

An initial commit to remove generic info from our marimo template repo and add a very rough layout (to be updated in a future ticket after consultation with stakeholders)

How can a reviewer manually see the effects of these changes?

To preview the notebook, run make run-notebook

Includes new or updated dependencies?

NO

Changes expectations for external applications?

NO

What are the relevant tickets?

Why these changes are being introduced:
The vulnerability GHSA-4xh5-x5gv-qwph is triggering an error
from pip-audit, but technically running python >= 3.12 is
sufficient to mitigate the risk.  Until pip releases a new
release, even though we have no risk, pip-audit will continue
to fail.

How this addresses that need:
* Explicitly ignores the vulnerability during vulnerability
scanning.

Side effects of this change:
* None

Relevant ticket(s):
* None
* Update notebook.py with temp CDPS dashboard layout
* Update README.md to remove generic info
* Update dependencies
* Update pyproject.toml to ignore ruff error
@ehanson8 ehanson8 requested a review from a team October 7, 2025 17:46
@ghukill ghukill self-assigned this Oct 7, 2025
Copy link

@ghukill ghukill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking like a great start! I ran the notebook and can see that the dropdown selection is utilized in a downstream cell.

Please let me know if you're looking for more feedback on any aspect in particular, but making sense so far.

@ehanson8
Copy link
Collaborator Author

ehanson8 commented Oct 8, 2025

Looking like a great start! I ran the notebook and can see that the dropdown selection is utilized in a downstream cell.

Please let me know if you're looking for more feedback on any aspect in particular, but making sense so far.

That's all, thanks! More substantive review required for all subsequent PRs

@ehanson8 ehanson8 merged commit 520ae46 into main Oct 8, 2025
2 checks passed
@ehanson8 ehanson8 deleted the initial-commit branch October 8, 2025 12:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants