Skip to content

Conversation

@jonavellecuerdo
Copy link
Contributor

@jonavellecuerdo jonavellecuerdo commented Oct 13, 2023

Why these changes are being introduced:

The Pipfile.lock shouldn't be included in the template as it risks pinning standard dependencies to outdated versions; unintentionally committed

What does this PR do?

Remove Pipfile.lock from template repo

Helpful background context

Unintentionally committed the Pipfile.lock through PR #7.

How can a reviewer manually see the effects of these changes?

Very minor change! I think the CI passing upon creating this PR is sufficient to show that everything is a-okay!

Includes new or updated dependencies?

NO

What are the relevant tickets?

https://mitlibraries.atlassian.net/browse/IN-894

Developer

  • All new ENV is documented in README (or there is none)
  • Stakeholder approval has been confirmed (or is not needed)

Code Reviewer

  • The commit message is clear and follows our guidelines
    (not just this pull request message)
  • There are appropriate tests covering any new functionality
  • The documentation has been updated or is unnecessary
  • The changes have been verified
  • New dependencies are appropriate or there were no changes

Why these changes are being introduced:
* The Pipfile.lock shouldn't be included in the template as it risks
pinning standard dependencies to outdated versions; unintentionally committed

How this addresses that need:
* Remove Pipfile.lock

Side effects of this change:
* None

Relevant ticket(s):
* https://mitlibraries.atlassian.net/browse/IN-894
Copy link
Contributor

@ghukill ghukill left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pipfile.lock removal approved!

@jonavellecuerdo jonavellecuerdo merged commit fba5ae5 into main Oct 13, 2023
@jonavellecuerdo jonavellecuerdo deleted the IN-894-remove-pipfile-lock branch October 13, 2023 20:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants