Conversation
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces significant modifications to the mail handling system within the Maple2 project. Key changes include updates to the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Warning Rate limit exceeded@AngeloTadeucci has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 9 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (8)
Maple2.Server.World/Service/WorldService.Sync.cs (2)
71-73: Improve the error message clarity.The error message could be more descriptive about the requirements. Consider clarifying that at least one identifier must be provided.
- throw new RpcException(new Status(StatusCode.InvalidArgument, "AccountId and CharacterId not specified")); + throw new RpcException(new Status(StatusCode.InvalidArgument, "Either AccountId or CharacterId must be specified"));
74-79: Optimize the player lookup logic.Consider checking if CharacterId is provided before attempting the lookup to avoid unnecessary database queries.
- if (!playerLookup.TryGet(request.CharacterId, out PlayerInfo? info)) { - info = playerLookup.TryGetByAccountId(request.AccountId); - if (info == null) { - return Task.FromResult(new MailNotificationResponse()); - } - } + PlayerInfo? info = null; + if (request.CharacterId > 0) { + if (!playerLookup.TryGet(request.CharacterId, out info)) { + info = null; + } + } + if (info == null && request.AccountId > 0) { + info = playerLookup.TryGetByAccountId(request.AccountId); + } + if (info == null) { + return Task.FromResult(new MailNotificationResponse()); + }Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs (3)
45-46: Consider performance optimizations for mail retrieval.The current implementation might face performance issues with large datasets:
- The OR condition in the WHERE clause (
mail.ReceiverId == characterId || mail.ReceiverId == accountId) might not utilize indexes effectively- Loading all items for all mails at once could be memory-intensive
- No pagination implementation beyond the
minIdfilterConsider these optimizations:
public ICollection<Mail> GetAllMail(long accountId, long characterId, long minId = 0) { - Mail[] mails = Context.Mail.Where(mail => mail.ReceiverId == characterId || mail.ReceiverId == accountId) + // Add pagination + const int pageSize = 100; + Mail[] mails = Context.Mail + .Where(mail => mail.Id > minId) + .Where(mail => mail.ReceiverId == characterId || mail.ReceiverId == accountId) + .OrderBy(mail => mail.Id) + .Take(pageSize) .Where(mail => mail.Id > minId) .AsEnumerable() .Select<Model.Mail, Mail>(mail => mail) .ToArray();
88-100: Consider adding concurrency control for mail read status.The implementation correctly handles both character and account-wide mails, but might be susceptible to race conditions during concurrent access.
Consider adding optimistic concurrency control:
public Mail? MarkMailRead(long mailId, long accountId, long characterId) { Context.ChangeTracker.QueryTrackingBehavior = QueryTrackingBehavior.TrackAll; Model.Mail? mail = Context.Mail.Find(characterId, mailId); if (mail == null) { mail = Context.Mail.Find(accountId, mailId); if (mail == null) { return null; } } + // Add concurrency token check + if (mail.ConcurrencyToken != expectedToken) { + throw new DbUpdateConcurrencyException("Mail was modified by another process"); + } + if (mail.ReadTime > DateTime.UnixEpoch) { return null; }
Line range hint
1-134: Consider separating account and character mail handling.While the current implementation successfully adds account-wide mail support, consider extracting the mail handling logic into separate strategies for account and character mails to improve maintainability and reduce complexity.
This could be achieved by:
- Creating an interface
IMailStrategywith implementations forAccountMailStrategyandCharacterMailStrategy- Using the strategy pattern to handle the different mail types
- Moving the common logic to a base class
This would make the code more maintainable and easier to extend in the future.
Maple2.Database/Model/Mail.cs (1)
Line range hint
94-102: Consider adding an index for ReceiverId and handling data integrityThe removal of the foreign key constraint aligns with the new requirements, but there are some considerations:
- Performance: Consider adding an index on ReceiverId since it will be frequently queried:
builder.HasKey(mail => new { mail.ReceiverId, mail.Id }); +builder.HasIndex(mail => mail.ReceiverId);
- Data Integrity: Since we've removed the foreign key constraint, consider adding application-level validation to ensure ReceiverId references valid accounts/characters:
builder.Property(mail => mail.ReceiverId).IsRequired(); +// Add check constraint to ensure ReceiverId > 0 +builder.HasCheckConstraint("CK_Mail_ReceiverId", "[ReceiverId] > 0");Maple2.Server.World/Containers/PlayerInfoLookup.cs (1)
60-62: Enhance XML documentation for better clarity.While the inline comments explain the purpose, consider adding XML documentation to better describe the method's behavior, especially regarding:
- The return value when multiple characters are online for the same account
- The implications of the online-only filter
- Usage guidelines for mail notifications
Consider adding this documentation:
+/// <summary> +/// Retrieves the first online player found for the specified account ID from the cache. +/// This method is specifically designed for account-wide mail notifications and should be used with caution. +/// </summary> +/// <param name="accountId">The account ID to search for</param> +/// <returns>The first online PlayerInfo found for the account, or null if no online players are found</returns> +/// <remarks> +/// Note: If multiple characters from the same account are online, only the first one found will be returned. +/// This method only searches the cache and will not query the database for offline players. +/// </remarks>Maple2.Server.Game/PacketHandlers/FunctionCubeHandler.cs (1)
217-226: Consider moving content mappings to configurationThe hardcoded mapping of quest tags to content IDs could become a maintenance burden. Consider moving these mappings to a configuration file or database table for easier maintenance.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
Maple2.Server.World/Migrations/20241121023155_RemoveMailReceiverIdFK.Designer.csis excluded by!Maple2.Server.World/Migrations/*Maple2.Server.World/Migrations/20241121023155_RemoveMailReceiverIdFK.csis excluded by!Maple2.Server.World/Migrations/*Maple2.Server.World/Migrations/Ms2ContextModelSnapshot.csis excluded by!Maple2.Server.World/Migrations/*
📒 Files selected for processing (8)
Maple2.Database/Model/Mail.cs(2 hunks)Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs(4 hunks)Maple2.Model/Game/Mail.cs(1 hunks)Maple2.Server.Core/proto/sync.proto(1 hunks)Maple2.Server.Game/Manager/MailManager.cs(6 hunks)Maple2.Server.Game/PacketHandlers/FunctionCubeHandler.cs(1 hunks)Maple2.Server.World/Containers/PlayerInfoLookup.cs(1 hunks)Maple2.Server.World/Service/WorldService.Sync.cs(2 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- Maple2.Model/Game/Mail.cs
🔇 Additional comments (15)
Maple2.Server.Core/proto/sync.proto (2)
33-34: LGTM! Changes align with account-wide mail requirements.
The modifications to MailNotificationRequest correctly support the new account-wide mail functionality by:
- Making
character_idoptional to remove the strict requirement - Adding
account_idto support account-level mail visibility
33-34: Ensure server-side validation of mail visibility rules.
Since both character_id and account_id are optional in the proto definition, there's no protocol-level prevention of invalid states (both being 0). Please ensure proper server-side validation enforces the visibility rules:
- If
account_idis 0: mail is restricted to specificcharacter_id - If
character_idis 0: mail is accessible to all characters under the account - Both cannot be 0 simultaneously
Let's verify the server-side validation:
✅ Verification successful
Let's search for mail-related files and validation patterns to better understand how these fields are handled.
Let's examine the mail management implementation to understand how these IDs are validated.
Server-side validation is properly implemented for mail visibility rules
Based on the code analysis, the server-side validation is correctly implemented in multiple layers:
-
In
GameStorage.Mail.cs, theGetMailandGetAllMailmethods enforce the visibility rules:- First checks for character-specific mail (
mail.ReceiverId == characterId) - Then checks for account-wide mail (
mail.ReceiverId == accountId) - Returns null if neither matches, preventing unauthorized access
- First checks for character-specific mail (
-
In
WorldService.Sync.cs, there's explicit validation:
if (request.CharacterId <= 0 && request.AccountId <= 0) {
throw new RpcException(new Status(StatusCode.InvalidArgument, "AccountId and CharacterId not specified"));
}- The
MailManagerclass handles all mail operations through these validated paths, ensuring the visibility rules are enforced throughout the application.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for validation logic in mail-related files
rg -A 5 "account.*id.*0.*character.*id.*0|character.*id.*0.*account.*id.*0"
# Look for mail visibility validation patterns
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($account_id == 0 || $character_id == 0) {
$$$
}'
Length of output: 154
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for files related to mail handling
fd -e cs -e proto "mail|Mail" --type f
# Look for validation patterns with character_id and account_id
rg -i "character.*id.*account.*id" -A 5
# Search for any validation checks in proto handlers
rg -i "validate.*mail|mail.*validate" -A 5
Length of output: 14764
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's examine the mail-related files more closely
cat Maple2.Server.Game/Manager/MailManager.cs
cat Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs
# Also search for any mail validation or error handling
rg -i "mail.*error|invalid.*mail" -A 5
Length of output: 30641
Maple2.Server.World/Service/WorldService.Sync.cs (2)
88-91: Verify gRPC contract compatibility.
The logic to ensure a valid CharacterId is present is correct. However, since the PR objectives mention that updating the gRPC MailNotificationRequest will be handled in a future PR, let's verify that modifying the request object here is safe.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now generate the final response:
Modifying CharacterId in the request is safe and follows the contract
The gRPC contract in sync.proto explicitly defines character_id as optional, and all usages across the codebase properly handle this optionality:
- The proto definition shows:
optional int64 character_id = 2 - The WorldService already validates for either
CharacterIdorAccountId - The ChannelService requires a valid
CharacterIdfor session lookup
The current change ensures compatibility between these services by populating the required field when available.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if MailNotificationRequest is used elsewhere in the codebase
# and verify that modifying CharacterId is safe.
# Search for MailNotificationRequest usage
rg -A 5 "MailNotificationRequest"
# Search for proto definition
fd -e proto | xargs rg "message MailNotificationRequest"
Length of output: 9437
Line range hint 71-91: Verify mail visibility rules implementation.
The PR objectives specify important visibility rules:
- If AccountId is 0, mail is restricted to specific CharacterId
- If CharacterId is 0, mail is accessible to all characters under the account
- Both values cannot be 0 simultaneously (which is correctly validated)
Please ensure these visibility rules are properly implemented in the channel service's MailNotification handler.
✅ Verification successful
Let me generate additional scripts to search for the mail visibility implementation in the channel service.
Let me search for more specific mail-related implementations.
Based on the code analysis, I can now generate the final response:
Mail visibility rules are correctly implemented in the database model and service layer.
The implementation aligns with the specified visibility rules:
- The
Mailmodel in bothMaple2.ModelandMaple2.Databaseexplicitly supports dual-mode receivers through theReceiverIdfield, documented as "Can be either AccountId or CharacterId" - The
MailManagerin the game service properly handles mail operations using both AccountId and CharacterId - The database queries in
GetMailmethod use both AccountId and CharacterId parameters for proper filtering - The mail creation across various features (BlackMarket, Marriage, Guild, etc.) correctly sets the ReceiverId based on whether it's account-wide or character-specific
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check the channel service implementation for mail visibility rules
# Search for the MailNotification handler in channel service
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
MailNotification($_, $_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for any mail-related visibility checks
rg -A 10 "AccountId.*CharacterId|CharacterId.*AccountId"
Length of output: 38966
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mail-related code in channel service and database
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
GetMail($_, $_, $_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for mail database queries
rg -A 5 "GetMail.*AccountId.*CharacterId|GetMail.*CharacterId.*AccountId"
# Search for mail table definitions
rg -A 10 "CREATE TABLE.*mail|CREATE TABLE.*Mail"
Length of output: 1127
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for mail database implementations and models
rg -A 10 "class MailManager|class Mail"
# Search for mail-related database operations
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ {
$$$
DeleteMail($_, $_, $_) {
$$$
}
$$$
}'
# Search for mail table access patterns
rg -A 10 "ReceiverId.*AccountId|ReceiverId.*CharacterId"
Length of output: 33169
Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs (1)
12-19: LGTM! Verify mail retrieval order.
The implementation correctly handles both character-specific and account-wide mail retrieval, with proper null checks.
Let's verify the mail retrieval order and usage:
✅ Verification successful
Mail retrieval order and access pattern verified
The verification shows consistent mail retrieval patterns across the codebase:
- All mail access goes through the
GetMailmethod inGameStorage.Mail.cs - The retrieval order is consistently implemented: character-specific first, then account-wide
- No direct database queries bypass this method, as all calls from
MailManageruse the properGetMailinterface
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any direct database queries that might bypass this method
# and ensure consistent mail retrieval order across the codebase
rg -A 3 "Context\.Mail\.Find|GetMail" --type cs
Length of output: 2786
Maple2.Database/Model/Mail.cs (1)
Line range hint 1-102: Verify the impact of Mail model changes
Let's verify the usage of the Mail model in the codebase to ensure all queries and relationships are properly updated.
✅ Verification successful
Based on the search results, I can now provide a final response regarding the Mail model changes:
Mail model changes are safe and properly implemented
The changes to the Mail model are well-structured and maintain backward compatibility:
- The
ReceiverIdfield is used consistently throughout the codebase for both account and character IDs - The database schema properly handles the dual-purpose
ReceiverIdthrough composite primary key(ReceiverId, Id) - The foreign key constraint to Character table has been intentionally removed (see migration
RemoveMailReceiverIdFK) to support the dual-purpose ID - All mail-related operations in the codebase properly handle both account-wide and character-specific mails through the storage layer
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Mail model usage in queries and joins
rg -l "Join.*Mail" --type cs
# Search for potential places where Character foreign key was used
rg -l "Include.*Mail.*Character" --type cs
# Look for existing queries that might be affected by the dual-purpose ReceiverId
ast-grep --pattern 'from $_ in $_Mail
where $_.ReceiverId == $_
select $_'
Length of output: 156
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for Mail model usage with more context
rg "Mail\." -A 5 -B 5 --type cs
# Search for ReceiverId usage in Mail-related code
rg "ReceiverId" -A 3 -B 3 --type cs
# Look for Mail-related database operations
ast-grep --pattern 'dbContext.$_Mail.$_'
Length of output: 163493
Maple2.Server.World/Containers/PlayerInfoLookup.cs (2)
63-65: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider performance and concurrency implications.
The current implementation has several potential concerns:
- Performance: Full scan of cache values for each call
- Race conditions: Cache values could change during iteration
- Multiple characters: Only returns first match arbitrarily
Consider these improvements:
public PlayerInfo? TryGetByAccountId(long accountId) {
- return cache.Values.FirstOrDefault(player => player.AccountId == accountId && player.Online);
+ // Create a secondary index for account lookups
+ private readonly ConcurrentDictionary<long, HashSet<long>> accountToCharacterIds = new();
+
+ // Update the index in the Update method
+ private void UpdateAccountIndex(PlayerInfo info) {
+ if (!accountToCharacterIds.TryGetValue(info.AccountId, out var characterIds)) {
+ characterIds = new HashSet<long>();
+ accountToCharacterIds[info.AccountId] = characterIds;
+ }
+ characterIds.Add(info.CharacterId);
+ }
+
+ public IEnumerable<PlayerInfo> GetOnlinePlayersByAccountId(long accountId) {
+ if (!accountToCharacterIds.TryGetValue(accountId, out var characterIds)) {
+ return Enumerable.Empty<PlayerInfo>();
+ }
+
+ return characterIds
+ .Select(charId => cache.TryGetValue(charId, out var player) ? player : null)
+ .Where(player => player != null && player.Online);
+ }
}This refactor:
- Improves lookup performance with a secondary index
- Returns all online characters for better visibility
- Reduces race conditions by using concurrent collections
Let's verify the impact of this change:
60-65: Verify mail notification behavior with multiple online characters.
The current implementation might miss notifying other online characters from the same account about mail updates.
Let's verify the mail notification flow:
Maple2.Server.Game/PacketHandlers/FunctionCubeHandler.cs (1)
228-239: Verify mail creation aligns with account-wide mail requirements
The implementation sets ReceiverId to ownerId which aligns with the PR objectives for account-wide mails. However, ensure this matches the visibility rules specified in issue #280:
- If AccountId is set to 0, mail is restricted to specific CharacterId
- If CharacterId is 0, mail is accessible to all characters under the account
✅ Verification successful
Mail implementation correctly handles account-wide visibility
Based on the code analysis, the mail system is correctly implemented for account-wide visibility:
- In
Maple2.Database/Model/Mail.cs, theReceiverIdfield is explicitly documented to handle both AccountId and CharacterId:public long ReceiverId { get; set; } // Can be either AccountId or CharacterId - In the provided code snippet, setting
ReceiverId = ownerIdis correct as it follows the same pattern used throughout the codebase for system mails. - The database schema and mail creation logic support this dual-purpose identifier approach, allowing mails to be associated with either an account or a specific character.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Check if Mail class has both AccountId and CharacterId fields
ast-grep --pattern 'class Mail {
$$$
AccountId $_
$$$
CharacterId $_
$$$
}'
Length of output: 87
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's first find the Mail class definition
rg "class Mail" -A 20
# Also search for any Mail-related database operations
rg "CreateMail|InsertMail" -A 5
Length of output: 22032
Maple2.Server.Game/Manager/MailManager.cs (6)
52-52: Inclusion of AccountId in DeleteMail ensures proper mail deletion
The addition of session.AccountId to the db.DeleteMail method aligns with the new account-wide mail functionality. It ensures that mails are correctly deleted based on both the account and character identifiers.
67-67: Modification of GetMail to include AccountId enhances mail retrieval
By adding session.AccountId to the db.GetMail call, the system now accurately retrieves mails associated with the account, supporting both account-wide and character-specific mails.
87-87: Including AccountId in Collect method supports account-wide mail collection
The inclusion of session.AccountId in the db.GetMail call within the Collect method ensures that account-wide mails can be collected appropriately by the user.
104-105: Assignment of AccountId and CharacterId to local variables improves readability
Storing session.AccountId and session.CharacterId in local variables accountId and characterId enhances code readability and simplifies subsequent method calls within the Fetch method.
114-114: Updating mail fetching logic to support account-wide mails
Using db.GetAllMail(accountId, characterId, lastReceivedMail) allows the Fetch method to retrieve all relevant mails, whether they are account-wide or character-specific, thereby enhancing the user experience.
140-140: Enhancement of MarkMailRead with AccountId for accurate status updates
Adding session.AccountId to the db.MarkMailRead call ensures that the mail read status is accurately updated for mails associated with the account, maintaining consistency in mail state management.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs(1 hunks)Maple2.Server.Game/Manager/MailManager.cs(2 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- Maple2.Server.Game/Manager/MailManager.cs
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs (2)
Line range hint 134-144: Update DeleteMail to support account-wide mails.
The method needs to be updated to handle both character-specific and account-wide mails, similar to the PR objectives.
Update the implementation:
-public bool DeleteMail(long mailId, long characterId) {
+public bool DeleteMail(long mailId, long characterId, long accountId) {
Context.ChangeTracker.QueryTrackingBehavior = QueryTrackingBehavior.TrackAll;
Model.Mail? mail = Context.Mail.Find(characterId, mailId);
if (mail == null) {
+ mail = Context.Mail.Find(accountId, mailId);
+ if (mail == null) {
return false;
+ }
}
+ // Validate that the requester has permission to delete this mail
+ if (mail.ReceiverId != characterId && mail.ReceiverId != accountId) {
+ return false;
+ }
+
Context.Mail.Remove(mail);
return SaveChanges();
}Line range hint 62-76: Implementation doesn't match PR objectives for account-wide mails.
The method only retrieves character-specific mails, but according to the PR objectives, it should also include account-wide mails.
Modify the implementation to include both character and account mails:
public ICollection<Mail> GetAllMail(long characterId, long minId = 0) {
- Mail[] mails = Context.Mail.Where(mail => mail.ReceiverId == characterId)
+ Mail[] mails = Context.Mail
+ .Where(mail => mail.ReceiverId == characterId || mail.ReceiverId == GetAccountId(characterId))
.Where(mail => mail.Id > minId)
+ .Include(mail => mail.Items) // Optimize by eager loading items
.AsEnumerable()
.Select<Model.Mail, Mail>(mail => mail)
.ToArray();
- foreach (Mail mail in mails) {
- foreach (Item item in GetAllItems(mail.Id)) {
- mail.Items.Add(item);
- }
- }
return mails;
}Additionally, consider adding pagination to prevent performance issues with large mail volumes.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs (1)
Line range hint
11-20: UpdateGetMailandDeleteMailto handle account-wide mails.These methods need to be updated to handle mails that belong to an account. They should check both accountId and characterId when looking up mails.
Consider these changes:
-public Mail? GetMail(long mailId, long characterId) { +public Mail? GetMail(long mailId, long accountId, long characterId) { Model.Mail? model = Context.Mail.Find(characterId, mailId); + if (model == null) { + model = Context.Mail.Find(accountId, mailId); + } if (model == null) { return null; } // ... rest of the method } -public bool DeleteMail(long mailId, long characterId) { +public bool DeleteMail(long mailId, long accountId, long characterId) { Context.ChangeTracker.QueryTrackingBehavior = QueryTrackingBehavior.TrackAll; Model.Mail? mail = Context.Mail.Find(characterId, mailId); + if (mail == null) { + mail = Context.Mail.Find(accountId, mailId); + } if (mail == null) { return false; } + // Validate that the requester has permission to delete this mail + if (mail.ReceiverId != characterId && mail.ReceiverId != accountId) { + return false; + } + Context.Mail.Remove(mail); return SaveChanges(); }Also applies to: 125-135
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
Maple2.Database/Storage/Game/GameStorage.Mail.cs(1 hunks)Maple2.Server.Game/Manager/MailManager.cs(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
Maple2.Server.Game/Manager/MailManager.cs (2)
104-105: LGTM: Clear variable declarations for account and character IDs.
The variables are appropriately extracted from the session object, making the code more readable and maintainable.
114-115: Verify the order of operations in mail fetching.
The implementation now binds account mails to the character before fetching all mails. Please ensure that:
BindAccountMailsToCharacterproperly handles the case where a mail is already boundGetAllMailcorrectly retrieves both character-specific and account-wide mails
Let's verify the implementation of these methods:
✅ Verification successful
Based on the code analysis, I can now provide a final response:
The mail binding and fetching implementation is correctly ordered and safe.
-
BindAccountMailsToCharactersafely handles duplicates through transaction management and early exit if no mails exist:- Uses transaction tracking
- Checks if there are any mails to bind (
if (mails.Count == 0) { Commit(); return; }) - Operates within a transaction scope
-
GetAllMailproperly retrieves all mails for a character:- Filters by receiver ID (
mail.ReceiverId == characterId) - Includes pagination support through
minIdparameter - Loads associated items for each mail
- Filters by receiver ID (
The implementation ensures that account-wide mails are properly bound to the character before fetching, and the database operations are performed atomically within transactions.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for the implementation of the new methods
ast-grep --pattern 'BindAccountMailsToCharacter($_,$_)'
ast-grep --pattern 'GetAllMail($_,$_)'
Length of output: 98
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a broader search with ripgrep to find these method implementations
rg -A 10 "BindAccountMailsToCharacter|GetAllMail" --type cs
Length of output: 3014
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's check if there's any duplicate handling or unique constraints in the mail binding
rg -A 5 "Mail\(" --type cs
# Also check for any mail-related database model definitions
rg -A 10 "class Mail" --type cs
Length of output: 30285
2 participants
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
Improvements
Bug Fixes