You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The plot consists of two vertically stacked subplots. The main upper subplot shows three calibration curves against a dashed black diagonal reference line representing perfect calibration. The "Well-Calibrated" model (blue line with circle markers) follows closely along the diagonal. The "Overconfident" model (yellow line with square markers) shows a steep S-curve pattern, jumping sharply from 0 to 1 around the 0.4-0.6 probability range. The "Underconfident" model (pink/magenta line with triangle markers) shows a flatter curve. Each model displays its Brier score in the legend (0.101, 0.020, 0.181 respectively). The lower subplot shows a histogram of predicted probability distributions for all three models, clearly showing that the overconfident model clusters predictions near 0 and 1, while the underconfident model clusters near 0.5, and the well-calibrated model has a more spread distribution. All text is clearly readable, colors are distinct and colorblind-friendly, and the layout is well-balanced.
Quality Score: 93/100
Criteria Checklist
Visual Quality (38/40 pts)
VQ-01: Text Legibility (10/10) - Title at 24pt, axis labels at 20pt, tick labels at 16pt, legend at 16pt - all perfectly readable
VQ-02: No Overlap (8/8) - No overlapping text or elements anywhere
VQ-03: Element Visibility (7/8) - Markers at size 12 with linewidth 3 are clearly visible; could be slightly larger but acceptable
VQ-04: Color Accessibility (5/5) - Blue, yellow, and pink/magenta are distinguishable for colorblind users
VQ-05: Layout Balance (5/5) - Two-subplot layout with 3:1 height ratio uses canvas effectively
VQ-06: Axis Labels (1/2) - Labels are descriptive ("Mean Predicted Probability", "Fraction of Positives", "Count") but lack units
VQ-07: Grid & Legend (2/2) - Grid at alpha=0.3 with dashed style is subtle, legends well-placed
Spec Compliance (25/25 pts)
SC-01: Plot Type (8/8) - Correct calibration/reliability diagram with diagonal reference
SC-02: Data Mapping (5/5) - X-axis shows mean predicted probability, Y-axis shows fraction of positives
SC-03: Required Features (5/5) - Has diagonal reference line, 10 bins, Brier scores displayed, histogram subplot for prediction distribution, multiple model comparison with distinct colors and legend
SC-04: Data Range (3/3) - Both axes range from 0 to 1 as appropriate for probabilities
SC-05: Legend Accuracy (2/2) - Legends correctly identify each model with Brier scores
SC-06: Title Format (2/2) - Uses exact format "calibration-curve · matplotlib · pyplots.ai"
Data Quality (18/20 pts)
DQ-01: Feature Coverage (7/8) - Shows well-calibrated, overconfident, and underconfident models demonstrating key calibration patterns; histogram clearly shows distribution differences
DQ-02: Realistic Context (6/7) - Simulated classifier outputs are plausible; using 35% positive rate is realistic for imbalanced classification
DQ-03: Appropriate Scale (5/5) - 2000 samples, probabilities correctly bounded 0-1, Brier scores in realistic range
Code Quality (10/10 pts)
CQ-01: KISS Structure (3/3) - Follows imports → data → plot → save structure, no functions or classes
CQ-03: Clean Imports (2/2) - Only imports matplotlib.pyplot and numpy, both used
CQ-04: No Deprecated API (1/1) - All APIs are current
CQ-05: Output Correct (1/1) - Saves as 'plot.png'
Library Features (2/5 pts)
LF-01: Uses distinctive library features (2/5) - Uses matplotlib correctly with subplots and gridspec_kw for height ratios, but doesn't leverage more distinctive matplotlib features like fill_between for confidence intervals or custom tick formatting
Strengths
Excellent multi-model comparison showing well-calibrated, overconfident, and underconfident classifiers
Includes histogram subplot as suggested in spec for showing prediction distributions
Brier scores integrated into legend for quick comparison
Clean separation of calibration curve calculation logic
Colorblind-friendly palette with distinct marker shapes for each model
Professional layout with appropriate subplot height ratios
Weaknesses
Axis labels lack units or additional context (e.g., could specify "probability" units explicitly)
Could use more distinctive matplotlib features like fill_between for confidence bands
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Implementation:
calibration-curve- matplotlibImplements the matplotlib version of
calibration-curve.File:
plots/calibration-curve/implementations/matplotlib.py🤖 impl-generate workflow