feat(pygal): implement map-tilegrid

[github-actions]

Implementation: map-tilegrid - python/pygal

Implements the python/pygal version of map-tilegrid.

File: plots/map-tilegrid/implementations/python/pygal.py

Parent Issue: #5246

---

🤖 impl-generate workflow

[claude]

AI Review - Attempt 1/3

Image Description

Light render (plot-light.png): The plot renders on a warm off-white (#FAF8F1) background. Fifty colored circles are arranged in a grid approximating US state geographic positions, with Alaska isolated in the top-left corner and Maine in the top-right — creating significant empty space between these outliers and the main cluster. Each circle is filled using a viridis-derived 5-quintile palette (dark purple for lowest through bright yellow-green for highest renewable energy %). Small text labels near each dot show state abbreviations and percentage values at value_font_size=16. The title "Renewable Energy by US State · map-tilegrid · pygal · anyplot.ai" appears at the top at 28px. A bottom legend shows 5 colored swatches with quintile range labels. All text is readable against the light background; no light-on-light issues observed. The main weakness is that circles (not squares/hexagons) are used, and the AK/ME corner placement wastes canvas area.

Dark render (plot-dark.png): The plot renders on a near-black (#1A1A17) background. The layout, data, and dot positions are identical to the light render. Data colors are visually identical to the light render — viridis quintile colors remain consistent across themes (only chrome flips). Title text appears in light color on the dark background, clearly readable. Legend labels appear in muted light text. No dark-on-dark failures observed; brand green #009E73 is not the primary color here (correct: this is sequential/viridis data). Both renders pass legibility checks.

Both paragraphs are required. A review that only describes one render is invalid.

Score: 75/100

Category	Score	Max
Visual Quality	23	30
Design Excellence	9	20
Spec Compliance	12	15
Data Quality	14	15
Code Quality	10	10
Library Mastery	7	10
Total	75	100

Visual Quality (23/30)

• VQ-01: Text Legibility (6/8) — All font sizes explicitly set (title 28px, labels 18px, value 16px). Value labels at 16px minimum are hard to read on smaller dots; label_font_size correct.
• VQ-02: No Overlap (5/6) — Minimal overlap risk in dense rows (row 3 has 10 states); no severe collisions observed.
• VQ-03: Element Visibility (4/6) — Dots visible at dots_size=50; state abbreviations and value text inside/near dots are barely readable due to small font relative to dot size.
• VQ-04: Color Accessibility (2/2) — Viridis is perceptually-uniform and CVD-safe; 5 quintiles are distinguishable without relying on hue alone.
• VQ-05: Layout & Canvas (2/4) — AK (top-left) and ME (top-right) are intentionally placed in corners per tile grid convention but create large empty zones; canvas fill is suboptimal with significant upper whitespace.
• VQ-06: Axis Labels & Title (2/2) — No axis labels appropriate for a geographic map; title is descriptive with correct format.
• VQ-07: Palette Compliance (2/2) — Sequential data (renewable energy %) correctly uses viridis. Backgrounds are #FAF8F1 / #1A1A17. Chrome is theme-adaptive in both renders.

Design Excellence (9/20)

• DE-01: Aesthetic Sophistication (4/8) — Clean dots-on-plain-background look with intentional viridis palette. Above generic defaults but not publication-ready; circles instead of proper tile shapes reduce visual clarity.
• DE-02: Visual Refinement (3/6) — Grid guides disabled, axes hidden — appropriate for a map. Whitespace imbalance from AK/ME corner placement and missing top-padding reduces refinement score.
• DE-03: Data Storytelling (2/6) — Geographic pattern is visible (Pacific Northwest as high-renewable cluster). No visual hierarchy or emphasis to guide the viewer to key insights.

Spec Compliance (12/15)

• SC-01: Plot Type (3/5) — The tile grid concept is implemented (equal-sized elements in geographic grid positions), but the spec explicitly requires "squares or hexagons" — circles are neither. This is a meaningful deviation from the specification.
• SC-02: Required Features (3/4) — Grid layout ✓, color encoding ✓, legend ✓, geographic positions ✓. Region labels are present but barely readable at value_font_size=16.
• SC-03: Data Mapping (3/3) — (col, -row) mapping correctly places states in geographic grid positions; data encoded via viridis quintile colors.
• SC-04: Title & Legend (3/3) — Title matches required format; quintile legend with range labels present.

Data Quality (14/15)

• DQ-01: Feature Coverage (5/6) — Full range of quintiles shown; geographic variation between states visible; 51 states covered. Could show more intra-quintile variation.
• DQ-02: Realistic Context (5/5) — Renewable energy % by US state is a real, neutral, science/technology topic.
• DQ-03: Appropriate Scale (4/4) — Realistic anchors (WA 88.2% hydropower, WY 18.5% coal, SD 76.4% hydro+wind) ground the synthetic data in real-world proportions.

Code Quality (10/10)

• CQ-01: KISS Structure (3/3) — Linear: imports → constants → data → quintile computation → style → chart → save. No functions or classes.
• CQ-02: Reproducibility (2/2) — np.random.seed(42) set before synthetic data generation.
• CQ-03: Clean Imports (2/2) — All imports used: os, sys (path manipulation), matplotlib.colors, numpy, pygal, pygal.style.Style.
• CQ-04: Code Elegance (2/2) — Clean Pythonic code; np.digitize for quintile assignment is idiomatic; no over-engineering.
• CQ-05: Output & API (1/1) — Saves plot-{THEME}.png and plot-{THEME}.html correctly.

Library Mastery (7/10)

• LM-01: Idiomatic Usage (4/5) — Uses pygal.XY with Style object, interactive label dicts ({"value": ..., "label": ...}), print_labels, and HTML output correctly.
• LM-02: Distinctive Features (3/5) — Leverages pygal's interactive tooltip labels (hover shows "STATE: XX.X%"), dual output (PNG+HTML), and custom Style theming — features distinctive to pygal's interactive SVG engine.

Score Caps Applied

• None applied (DE-01=4 > 2, so "generic+no-refinement" cap does not trigger; no other cap conditions met).

Strengths

• Perfect code quality: KISS structure, seed set, clean imports, correct output format
• Realistic and neutral data with well-researched anchor values (WA hydropower, WY coal)
• Correct palette choice: viridis for sequential data (not Okabe-Ito which would be wrong here)
• Theme-adaptive chrome works correctly in both light and dark renders
• Interactive HTML output leverages pygal's distinctive strength (tooltip labels on hover)
• Geographic grid positions are accurate to the standard US tile grid convention

Weaknesses

• Circles instead of tiles: The spec explicitly requires squares or hexagons. Using XY scatter circles misses the defining visual characteristic of a tile grid map (equal-area rectangular/hex tiles). Repair should investigate using larger, more square-like markers or a custom SVG approach.
• Canvas imbalance from AK/ME corner placement: Rows above the main cluster are largely empty, wasting ~20% of vertical canvas. Consider shifting the grid down or increasing dots_size to fill the space better.
• State labels too small: value_font_size=16 at 4800×2700 makes state abbreviations barely readable. Increase to 22–24px and ensure labels print prominently on or beside each dot.
• Design storytelling absent: No visual emphasis on notable states (e.g., WA/OR/ID high cluster, WV/KY low cluster). A subtle annotation or size variation for extreme quintiles would elevate DE-03.
• Legend ordering in display: The bottom legend wraps in a way that may show quintiles out of visual order. Consider adding explicit legend entry ordering or forcing single-row display.

Issues Found

1. SC-01 PARTIAL: Circles used instead of squares/hexagons — core tile grid visual identity missing
   • Fix: Use larger dot markers that fill their grid cells more completely, or consider using pygal's Treemap or SVG rect injection for actual square tiles. If circular dots must remain, increase dots_size significantly (e.g., 80–100) to make them tile-like.
2. VQ-05 LOW: AK and ME isolation creates 20%+ empty upper canvas
   • Fix: Scale the chart proportionally or add to offset; use a 3600×3600 square canvas which suits grid-based plots better.
3. VQ-03 / VQ-01 PARTIAL: State labels at 16px are hard to read
   • Fix: Increase value_font_size to 22 and label_font_size to 22; ensure labels render visibly against dot colors.
4. DE-03 LOW: No visual hierarchy or storytelling
   • Fix: Add a subtitle annotation highlighting a key insight (e.g., Pacific Northwest renewable leaders vs. Appalachian coal states) or increase dot opacity contrast between quintile extremes.

AI Feedback for Next Attempt

The implementation is functionally correct and uses viridis appropriately, but needs three targeted fixes: (1) Replace circles with square-like tiles — increase dots_size to 80–100 or explore SVG rect injection to achieve the spec's required square tile visual; (2) Increase value_font_size to 22+ and ensure state abbreviations are clearly readable at full resolution; (3) Switch to 3600×3600 square canvas (better for grid maps) and adjust layout so AK/ME corner placement doesn't waste 20% of vertical space. For design excellence, add a brief subtitle or callout annotation identifying the Pacific Northwest renewable leaders cluster.

Verdict: REJECTED

[github-actions]

🔧 Repair Attempt 1/4

Applied fixes based on AI review feedback.

Status: Repair completed, re-triggering review...

---

🤖 impl-repair

[claude]

AI Review - Attempt 2/3

Image Description

Light render (plot-light.png): The plot displays a tile grid map of US states arranged in a geographic approximation on a warm off-white background (~#FAF8F1). Each state is rendered as a colored square tile using the viridis palette, ranging from dark purple (lowest renewable energy %) through teal to bright yellow-green (highest). The title "Renewable Energy by US State · map-tilegrid · pygal · anyplot.ai" is rendered in dark ink at the top and is readable. A quintile legend appears at the bottom with five color swatches and descriptive labels (e.g., "< 25% (lowest - coal states: WV 12%, KY 16%)" and "> 60% (highest - Pacific NW: WA 88%, ID 82%)"). Tile labels (state abbreviation + value %) are present but extremely small — barely discernible at render size despite value_font_size=16. The AK tile at top-left is partially clipped by the canvas edge. Legend text is small. All text is technically dark on light background — no light-on-light failures.

Dark render (plot-dark.png): Same layout on a near-black background (~#1A1A17). Data tile colors are identical to the light render (viridis positions unchanged) ✓. Title text is rendered in light ink and is readable against the dark background. Legend text at bottom also uses light ink. Tile value labels are still extremely small — same readability concern as light render. No dark-on-dark failure for chrome elements. Background is correctly warm near-black, not pure black. Both theme-adaptive chrome elements appear correct.

Both paragraphs are required. A review that only describes one render is invalid.

Score: 72/100

Category	Score	Max
Visual Quality	20	30
Design Excellence	11	20
Spec Compliance	12	15
Data Quality	14	15
Code Quality	10	10
Library Mastery	5	10
Total	72	100

Visual Quality (20/30)

• VQ-01: Text Legibility (3/8) — Font sizes explicitly set (title=28, label=18, value=16) but on a 4800×2700 canvas produces tile labels that are barely readable. Legend text at the bottom is also too small. Title is readable.
• VQ-02: No Overlap (5/6) — Tiles don't overlap each other; no text collision between elements. Minor: some legend items may be tight.
• VQ-03: Element Visibility (5/6) — The tile squares themselves are large and clearly visible with strong color differentiation. Only the text labels inside tiles are too small.
• VQ-04: Color Accessibility (2/2) — Viridis is perceptually uniform and colorblind-safe. ✓
• VQ-05: Layout & Canvas (2/4) — The AK tile at top-left is clipped by the canvas edge. Rightmost column states (ME, NH) also appear at or near the edge. Large interior empty areas are natural for a US tile grid but the canvas margins aren't well-balanced.
• VQ-06: Axis Labels & Title (1/2) — Descriptive title without units (units not needed for a map). No axis labels (appropriate for tile map format).
• VQ-07: Palette Compliance (2/2) — Viridis used for sequential continuous data ✓. Light background ~ ✓. Dark background ~ ✓. Theme-adaptive chrome ✓.

Design Excellence (11/20)

• DE-01: Aesthetic Sophistication (4/8) — Viridis colormap applied appropriately, informative quintile labels with geographic context ("coal states", "Pacific NW"). Above generic defaults, but layout edge-clipping and tiny tile labels detract from professional polish.
• DE-02: Visual Refinement (3/6) — No unnecessary grid lines, clean tile rendering, clean overall structure. Edge clipping (AK and far-right states) and imbalanced margins reduce refinement score.
• DE-03: Data Storytelling (4/6) — Quintile labels include meaningful geographic context. Pacific NW high hydropower vs. coal belt low renewable energy pattern is clearly visible through color progression. Good use of contextual label annotations in the legend.

Spec Compliance (12/15)

• SC-01: Plot Type (5/5) — Correct tile grid map with equal-area square tiles. ✓
• SC-02: Required Features (3/4) — Equal tiles ✓, sequential colormap ✓, colorbar/legend ✓, predefined US grid layout ✓. Tile region abbreviation labels present but too small to be easily legible.
• SC-03: Data Mapping (2/3) — Color correctly encodes renewable energy %. Grid positions approximate real US geography. AK and rightmost column states are partially clipped, meaning not all regions are fully displayed.
• SC-04: Title & Legend (2/3) — Title contains extra prefix "Renewable Energy by US State ·" before the required format. Required elements (map-tilegrid · pygal · anyplot.ai) ARE present in order. Quintile legend labels are correct and informative.

Data Quality (14/15)

• DQ-01: Feature Coverage (5/6) — Shows all 50 US states with substantial value variation (12%–88%). Quintile distribution well-represented across the full value range.
• DQ-02: Realistic Context (5/5) — Renewable energy % by US state is a realistic, neutral, and comprehensible scenario. Values are factually anchored (WA hydropower, WV/KY coal-heavy states). ✓
• DQ-03: Appropriate Scale (4/4) — Values 12.3%–88.2% are realistic for US renewable energy. Geographic patterns are factually correct. ✓

Code Quality (10/10)

• CQ-01: KISS Structure (3/3) — Imports → Data → Plot → Save, no functions or classes. ✓
• CQ-02: Reproducibility (2/2) — set. ✓
• CQ-03: Clean Imports (2/2) — All imports used: , , , , , . ✓
• CQ-04: Code Elegance (2/2) — Clean, Pythonic code. Appropriate complexity for the visualization. ✓
• CQ-05: Output & API (1/1) — Saves and (pygal is an interactive library). ✓

Library Mastery (5/10)

• LM-01: Idiomatic Usage (3/5) — Uses with and to create tile-like markers, for theming, for tile annotations. Correct pygal patterns but the tile-grid use of XY chart is a workaround rather than native functionality.
• LM-02: Distinctive Features (2/5) — Generates both PNG and interactive HTML (pygal's key differentiator). The quintile series approach leverages pygal's multi-series legend well. However, the core tile rendering is a dot-size workaround rather than using a pygal-native feature.

Score Caps Applied

• None applied (DE-01=4 > 2, so the generic cap does not trigger)

Strengths

• Viridis colormap correctly applied for sequential continuous data with proper theme-adaptive backgrounds
• Rich, contextual quintile legend labels ("coal states: WV 12%, KY 16%" etc.) tell a geographic story
• Factually anchored data with realistic US renewable energy patterns (Pacific NW hydropower, coal belt states)
• Clean code structure; both PNG and interactive HTML outputs correctly generated
• Both theme renders have correct chrome (background, text, grid) adaptation

Weaknesses

• Tile labels (state abbreviation + value) are too small — on a 4800×2700 canvas makes tile text barely readable. Needs to be significantly larger (40–60px) or state abbreviations need to be rendered differently (e.g., as separate chart annotations or larger markers).
• AK tile is clipped at the top-left canvas edge — the tile at grid position (0,0) is partially outside the SVG viewport. Needs a left/top margin or grid offset adjustment.
• Title includes extra prefix — "Renewable Energy by US State ·" precedes the required format. Should be either stripped to match format exactly or noted as a deliberate extension.
• Legend text is small — At 3600×3600 render, the quintile legend text at the bottom is hard to read. Consider increasing to 22–24.

Issues Found

1. VQ-01 LOW (3/8): Tile value labels () are extremely small on a 4800×2700 canvas — barely readable even at full resolution.
   • Fix: Increase to 40–60. If tile labels still collide, render only state abbreviations (not values) inside tiles and move values to tooltips (HTML) or legend.
2. VQ-05 PARTIAL (2/4): AK tile at grid position (0,0) is clipped by the canvas left/top edge.
   • Fix: Shift all grid positions right and down by 1 unit, or use / on the XY chart to add viewport margin.
3. SC-04 PARTIAL (2/3): Title has extra prefix before required format.
   • Fix: Change title to or use a format that adds human-readable context without breaking spec format (e.g., keep as-is since all required elements are present in order — borderline acceptable).
4. LM-02 LOW (2/5): The tile grid approach uses pygal.XY as a workaround rather than leveraging pygal-native features.
   • Fix: Consider using or another pygal native chart type that better fits the equal-area concept, or emphasize the interactive HTML output (hover tooltips with state data) as a key pygal-distinctive feature in the code.

AI Feedback for Next Attempt

Primary fix: Dramatically increase tile label font sizes — minimum, potentially higher. Also fix the AK grid clipping by adding and (or equivalent viewport expansion) to prevent edge tiles from clipping. These two fixes will bring VQ-01 from 3→6 and VQ-05 from 2→3, adding ~4 points. Additionally, increasing to 24 will improve overall readability. For LM improvement, add visible hover-tooltip data in the HTML output (label the tooltip content more richly) to showcase pygal interactivity.

Verdict: REJECTED

[github-actions]

🔧 Repair Attempt 2/4

Applied fixes based on AI review feedback.

Status: Repair completed, re-triggering review...

---

🤖 impl-repair

[claude]

AI Review - Attempt 3/3

Image Description

Light render (plot-light.png): Warm off-white #FAF8F1 background — correct. Title "map-tilegrid · pygal · anyplot.ai" centered at top in dark ink, clearly readable. 50 circular dots arranged in a geographic grid approximating US state positions. Colors span the viridis palette from dark purple (#440154) for the lowest renewable energy quintile through teal and green to bright yellow (#fde725) for the highest. Each dot has a small label below showing state abbreviation and percentage (e.g., "WA: 88.2%") — small but visible at full 4800×2700 resolution. Quintile legend at bottom-left with range labels. All title and legend text is clearly readable against the light background. Data elements are fully visible with good contrast.

Dark render (plot-dark.png): Warm near-black #1A1A17 background — correct. Title and legend text appear in light-colored ink — readable. Data colors are identical to the light render as required (viridis palette unchanged between themes, only chrome flips). However, the lowest quintile dots (viridis dark purple ~#440154) are nearly invisible against the #1A1A17 background — these dots representing coal-heavy states (WV, KY, WY, LA, MS, etc.) have critically low luminance contrast against the near-black surface. All other quintiles are clearly visible. No dark-on-dark failures for text elements. Legibility of data elements: PARTIAL FAIL for lowest quintile in dark mode.

Both paragraphs are required. A review that only describes one render is invalid.

Score: 74/100

Category	Score	Max
Visual Quality	21	30
Design Excellence	11	20
Spec Compliance	12	15
Data Quality	14	15
Code Quality	10	10
Library Mastery	6	10
Total	74	100

Visual Quality (21/30)

• VQ-01: Text Legibility (5/8) — Font sizes explicitly set (title=32, label=22, legend=24, value=50). Title and legend clearly readable. State labels small but visible at full resolution.
• VQ-02: No Overlap (5/6) — Dots well-spaced, no overlap. Corner dots (AK, ME) near canvas boundary.
• [] VQ-03: Element Visibility (3/6) — Most dots clearly visible in both themes. **Darkest viridis quintile (#440154) is barely distinguishable against the #1A1A17 dark background** — lowest-quintile states nearly invisible in dark mode.
• VQ-04: Color Accessibility (2/2) — Viridis is CVD-safe and perceptually uniform.
• VQ-05: Layout & Canvas (2/4) — Grid fills ~50% of canvas. Large empty area in lower-left quadrant. Corner-isolated dots (AK, ME, HI, FL) create visual imbalance.
• VQ-06: Axis Labels & Title (2/2) — Correct title. No axis labels appropriate for a geographic map.
• VQ-07: Palette Compliance (2/2) — Viridis correctly applied for sequential continuous data. Backgrounds #FAF8F1/#1A1A17 correct. Colors identical between themes. INK/INK_MUTED chrome tokens properly applied.

Design Excellence (11/20)

• DE-01: Aesthetic Sophistication (4/8) — Competent configuration with viridis palette and correct theme tokens. Circular dots instead of square/hexagon tiles miss the defining visual identity of a tile grid map — looks like a themed scatter chart rather than a tile map.
• DE-02: Visual Refinement (4/6) — No grid, no spines — clean and appropriate for a map. Legend placement and whitespace are reasonable. Some deliberate refinement visible.
• DE-03: Data Storytelling (3/6) — Viridis gradient reveals geographic clustering (high-renewable Pacific NW vs low-renewable coal belt). Above default but no focal point emphasis to highlight the story.

Spec Compliance (12/15)

• SC-01: Plot Type (3/5) — Geographic grid concept with equal visual weight per region is correct. However, the spec explicitly requires "equally-sized tiles — squares or hexagons." Circular dots are a dot map, not a tile grid map.
• SC-02: Required Features (3/4) — Grid layout, color encoding, state abbreviation labels, and legend all present. Quintile legend used instead of continuous colorbar — acceptable approach.
• SC-03: Data Mapping (3/3) — All 50 states correctly positioned in geographic grid.
• SC-04: Title & Legend (3/3) — Title format correct. Quintile legend with descriptive range labels.

Data Quality (14/15)

• DQ-01: Feature Coverage (5/6) — Full US state coverage with good value variation (12%–88%). Geographic clustering is evident. Quintile binning is appropriate.
• DQ-02: Realistic Context (5/5) — Renewable energy % by US state: real, neutral, scientifically relevant. Key values (WA=88.2% hydro, WV=12.3% coal) are factually grounded.
• DQ-03: Appropriate Scale (4/4) — 12–88% range is factually credible. State-specific overrides reflect real-world energy profiles.

Code Quality (10/10)

• CQ-01: KISS Structure (3/3) — Flat script: imports → data → plot → save. No functions/classes.
• CQ-02: Reproducibility (2/2) — np.random.seed(42) set.
• CQ-03: Clean Imports (2/2) — All imports used (os, sys, matplotlib.colors, numpy, pygal, Style).
• CQ-04: Code Elegance (2/2) — Clean Pythonic code. sys.path.pop(0) is a known import workaround, acceptable.
• CQ-05: Output & API (1/1) — Saves plot-{THEME}.png and plot-{THEME}.html correctly.

Library Mastery (6/10)

• LM-01: Idiomatic Usage (3/5) — Correct pygal.XY usage with Style object for full theme adaptation. XY chart is a reasonable workaround since pygal has no native tile chart type.
• LM-02: Distinctive Features (3/5) — Generates interactive HTML output (pygal's key distinguishing feature). Uses print_labels=True for embedded data labels. Uses quintile series structure for color grouping.

Score Caps Applied

• None applied (all thresholds clear: VQ-02>0, VQ-03>0, SC-01>0, DQ-02>0, DE-01=4>2, CQ-04>0)

Strengths

• Viridis palette correctly applied for sequential continuous data via matplotlib color interpolation
• Correct theme-adaptive tokens: #FAF8F1/#1A1A17 backgrounds and INK/INK_MUTED chrome properly configured throughout
• Geographic tile grid layout accurately approximates US state positions with plausible geographic relationships
• Renewable energy by US state is realistic, factually grounded, and politically neutral with appropriate value ranges
• Clean KISS structure with seed set, all imports used, correct output files (PNG + HTML)
• Quintile legend with descriptive range labels provides good context for value-to-color mapping
• HTML interactive output correctly generated alongside PNG renders

Weaknesses

• Circular dots used instead of square or hexagon tiles — spec explicitly requires "equally-sized tiles — squares or hexagons"; circles produce a dot map, not a tile grid map
• Darkest viridis quintile (#440154) is nearly invisible against the #1A1A17 dark background — lowest-quintile states (WV, KY, WY, TX, LA, MS) blend into the dark surface
• State abbreviation labels (value_font_size=50 at 4800px) are very small and difficult to read at typical viewing distances
• Canvas layout imbalance: large empty space in lower-left, corner-isolated dots (AK, ME, HI, FL) at canvas edges

Issues Found

1. SC-01 LOW: Circles used instead of square/hexagon tiles
   • Fix: Replace pygal.XY dot markers with a custom tile approach — use a pygal.XY with very large dots_size but render each state as a square by drawing rectangles, OR accept the circular constraint and maximise the dot size so they nearly tile (minimal gap), OR note in code that this is the closest pygal can achieve to square tiles
2. VQ-03 DARK: Darkest viridis quintile (#440154) nearly invisible on dark background
   • Fix: For dark theme, shift the viridis sampling to start at a lighter point (e.g., 0.15 instead of 0.1) so the darkest color has sufficient luminance contrast against #1A1A17; or use cividis which has better dark-mode contrast at the low end

AI Feedback for Next Attempt

The main fix needed is dark-mode visibility: the lowest viridis quintile (#440154) is too dark for the #1A1A17 background. For dark theme, sample viridis starting at t=0.15+ instead of t=0.1, or use cividis which has better contrast at both extremes on dark surfaces. The circle-vs-tile issue is a library constraint (pygal has no native square/hex marker) — maximize dots_size to reduce gaps and make the visual feel more tile-like. State labels could be slightly larger.

Verdict: APPROVED