Document std::mutex constructor nonconformance

[AlexGuteniev]

No description provided.

[PRMerger15]

@AlexGuteniev : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

[ktoliver]

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"

[TylerMSFT]

Hi,
Thank you for taking an interest in the docs.
I'm not incorporating this change for two reasons.

• Our docs reflect the signature according to our implementation, which isn't constexpr
• I'm not sure the note is accurate, either. I'll take it up with the library team about adding an explanation as to why it isn't constexpr.

[AlexGuteniev]

• Our docs reflect the signature according to our implementation, which isn't constexpr

Currently it doesn't, this is what I want to fix.

• I'm not sure the note is accurate, either. I'll take it up with the library team about adding an explanation as to why it isn't constexpr.

Ok.

I will prefer to either keep this PR open, or an issue created instead of it, to keep track of this.

[TylerMSFT]

@AlexGueteniev, unfortunately, it's addressed to the wrong audience. The documentation team can't change the product. Instead, I recommend bringing this issue up on Developer Community, where it can be seen by the product team. They'll take this under consideration. In the meantime, I'm closing this as not a documentation issue.

[TylerMSFT]

@AlexGuteniev , I created an issue on the STL repo regarding this for you: microsoft/STL#2295

[TylerMSFT]

For the record, I read the diff wrong and we do need to remove constexpr from the std::mutex constructor. Which I've done.

[AlexGuteniev]

It still says constexpr https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/cpp/standard-library/mutex-class-stl?view=msvc-160#mutex

[TylerMSFT]

No, it doesn't. Press. F5 to refresh the page in your browser.

[AlexGuteniev]

No, it doesn't. Press. F5 to refresh the page in your browser.

I Confirm, it is updated