Skip to content

Update userelationship-function-dax.md#304

Merged
v-dirichards merged 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
MjrToland:patch-1
Apr 17, 2025
Merged

Update userelationship-function-dax.md#304
v-dirichards merged 1 commit intoMicrosoftDocs:mainfrom
MjrToland:patch-1

Conversation

@MjrToland
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Reference on the bottom DAX was to [ShipmentDate] and not the [ShippingDate] used in the code example above, changed to line up to remove ambiguity.

Reference on the bottom DAX was to [ShipmentDate] and not the [ShippingDate] used in the code example above, changed to line up to remove ambiguity.
@prmerger-automator
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@MjrToland : Thanks for your contribution! The author(s) and reviewer(s) have been notified to review your proposed change.

@learn-build-service-prod
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Learn Build status updates of commit 4557013:

✅ Validation status: passed

File Status Preview URL Details
query-languages/dax/userelationship-function-dax.md ✅Succeeded

For more details, please refer to the build report.

For any questions, please:

@v-dirichards
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@jeroenterheerdt

Can you review the proposed changes?

Important: When the changes are ready for publication, adding a #sign-off comment is the best way to signal that the PR is ready for the review team to merge.

#label:"aq-pr-triaged"
@MicrosoftDocs/public-repo-pr-review-team

@prmerger-automator prmerger-automator Bot added the aq-pr-triaged tracking label for the PR review team label Apr 17, 2025
@jeroenterheerdt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

jeroenterheerdt commented Apr 17, 2025

Thanks @MjrToland! Really appreciate the help here. This is now ready for merge!

@jeroenterheerdt
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

#sign-off

@v-dirichards v-dirichards merged commit 8155c5b into MicrosoftDocs:main Apr 17, 2025
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants