Skip to content

Conversation

@glyh
Copy link
Member

@glyh glyh commented May 27, 2025

As title. Nothing fancy here. This is part of project Snark Worker Rework

@glyh glyh requested a review from a team as a code owner May 27, 2025 05:21
@glyh
Copy link
Member Author

glyh commented May 27, 2025

!ci-build-me

@glyh glyh added the snark-worker-optim Snark worker optimization: make workers operate on the level of individual proofs instead of whole t label May 28, 2025
@@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
type t =
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This test file makes no sense to me

Normally test pragma defines a test executable, here we define an executable that defines a type but does nothing.

Will an implementation of the test appear here later? Maybe then it makes sense to implement the test and push the type together with the implementation?

Or should it be a (library) pragma in dune file?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would later add real test here. This is blocked by Work Partitioner PRs

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Could we hold merging it now, and update it later, when the necessary Work Partitioner PRs will land the compatible?

@glyh glyh closed this Jun 2, 2025
@glyh glyh reopened this Jun 2, 2025
@glyh glyh marked this pull request as draft June 10, 2025 07:47
@glyh glyh closed this Jun 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

snark-worker-optim Snark worker optimization: make workers operate on the level of individual proofs instead of whole t

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants