Skip to content

GEOPY-2137: Use dask.distributed with workers as default behaviour #84

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
benk-mira merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025
Merged

GEOPY-2137: Use dask.distributed with workers as default behaviour #84

benk-mira merged 3 commits into from
Apr 24, 2025

Conversation

@domfournier
Copy link

@domfournier domfournier commented Apr 19, 2025 •
edited by github-actions bot
Loading

GEOPY-2137 - Use dask.distributed with workers as default behaviour

Summary

PR Checklist

  • If this is a work in progress PR, set as a Draft PR
  • Linted my code according to the style guides.
  • Added tests to verify changes to the code.
  • Added necessary documentation to any new functions/classes following the
    expect style.
  • Marked as ready for review (if this is was a draft PR), and converted
    to a Pull Request
  • Tagged @simpeg/simpeg-developers when ready for review.

Reference issue

What does this implement/fix?

Additional information

@github-actions github-actions bot changed the title GEOPY-2137 GEOPY-2137: Use dask.distributed with workers as default behaviour Apr 19, 2025
@sebhmg sebhmg requested a review from benk-mira April 23, 2025 04:38
@sebhmg sebhmg mentioned this pull request Apr 23, 2025
Merged
@benk-mira benk-mira merged commit 1ce529a into release/0.23.0.1 Apr 24, 2025
6 of 7 checks passed
@benk-mira benk-mira deleted the GEOPY-2137 branch April 24, 2025 19:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

@benk-mira benk-mira benk-mira approved these changes

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants

@domfournier @benk-mira