Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded
Your organization is not enrolled in usage-based pricing. Contact your admin to enable usage-based pricing to continue reviews beyond the rate limit, or try again in 30 minutes and 5 seconds. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. ℹ️ Review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (2)
WalkthroughUpdates AI-assisted review guidance and C++ coding standards docs: changes include stricter feature-flag name validation, new AI-generated code block markers, tightened platformio.ini modification rules, expanded const/constexpr and enum naming guidance, ESP8266 bit-shift notes, LittleFS filename caveat, and added human-only instruction blocks. (≤50 words) Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
@coderabbitai please check if |
|
Tip For best results, initiate chat on the files or code changes. 🧩 Analysis chain🏁 Script executed: Length of output: 6099
Findings:
🧠 Learnings used |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Moved feature flags into separate sub-section added code example
Clarified the recommendation for using explicit shifts on RISC-V and ESP8266 boards.
|
@coderabbitai review |
✅ Actions performedReview triggered.
|
Removed instruction about using common functions in Web UI updates.
updated instructions / coding guides, to incorporate changes from upstream WLED.
Summary by CodeRabbit