Add trade-pubkey action case #10
Conversation
Include trade-index in some messages Small fixes
WalkthroughThis pull request introduces several documentation updates for the Mostro P2P trading platform. The changes primarily focus on adding a Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
src/take_buy.md (1)
Line range hint
1-11: Document trade_index validation rulesPlease add validation rules for the
trade_indexfield:
- Is it always a positive integer?
- Does it need to be sequential?
- What happens if duplicate indices exist?
- How should implementations handle missing indices?
Consider adding a section explaining these rules to maintain consistency across implementations.
🧹 Nitpick comments (9)
src/overview.md (1)
17-17: Fix grammar in the example introduction.The sentence structure needs improvement.
-These fields are relative to the wrapper, here an example of a `take-buy` order message: +These fields are relative to the wrapper. Here is an example of a `take-buy` order message:🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[grammar] ~17-~17: A verb may be missing.
Context: ...ese fields are relative to the wrapper, here an example of atake-buyorder messag...(THERE_MISSING_VERB)
src/release.md (1)
Line range hint
89-89: Fix typo in the documentation.There's a minor typo in the text.
-Mostro will then attempt to pay the buyer's invoice, if the payment successds Mostro updates +Mostro will then attempt to pay the buyer's invoice, if the payment succeeds Mostro updatessrc/take_sell.md (1)
10-11: Consider documenting trade_index behavior comprehensivelyThe addition of the
trade_indexfield appears to be part of a larger feature for trade tracking. Consider adding a dedicated section in the documentation that explains:
- The purpose and significance of the trade_index
- How it's generated and managed
- Its behavior across different order types (regular, range, lightning address)
- Its role in order state transitions
- Best practices for clients implementing this field
src/order_event.md (3)
5-7: Consider rephrasing for clarity and impactThe abstract could be more concise and impactful. Consider rephrasing to emphasize the key benefit of combining liquidity pools.
-Peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms have seen an upturn in recent years, while having more and more options is positive, in the specific case of p2p, having several options contributes to the liquidity split, meaning sometimes there's not enough assets available for trading. If we combine all these individual solutions into one big pool of orders, it will make them much more competitive compared to centralized systems, where a single authority controls the liquidity. +Peer-to-peer (P2P) platforms have proliferated, leading to fragmented liquidity across multiple platforms. While platform diversity is beneficial, the scattered liquidity often results in insufficient trading assets. By combining these individual liquidity pools, P2P platforms can better compete with centralized systems that benefit from consolidated liquidity under single authority control.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[style] ~5-~5: The phrase ‘in recent years’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others.
Context: ...eer (P2P) platforms have seen an upturn in recent years, while having more and more options is ...(IN_RECENT_STYLE)
13-45: Add validation rules for critical fieldsThe JSON structure is well-defined, but consider adding validation rules for critical fields to ensure data consistency across implementations.
Consider adding:
- Valid ranges for
premiumvalues- Format requirements for
geohash- Allowed values for
networkandlayer- Maximum length for
name- Format requirements for
bondamount
62-62: Fix hyphenation in face-to-face-The geohash of the operation, it can be useful in a face to face trade. +The geohash of the operation, it can be useful in a face-to-face trade.🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~62-~62: It appears that hyphens are missing.
Context: ...of the operation, it can be useful in a face to face trade. -bond[Bond]: The bond amount...(FACE_TO_FACE_HYPHEN)
src/take_buy_range_order.md (1)
11-11: Consider using a placeholder for trade_index valueThe hardcoded value
"trade_index": 1might be misleading. Consider using a more generic placeholder to indicate this is an example value that will vary in practice.- "trade_index": 1, + "trade_index": <trade_index>,src/release_range_order.md (1)
3-3: Consider adding error scenarios documentationThe documentation would benefit from including possible error scenarios and their handling, such as:
- What happens if the trade_pubkey message fails?
- How to handle timeouts?
- What are the retry mechanisms?
src/take_sell_ln_address.md (1)
13-13: Use a generic example for lightning addressConsider using a generic example instead of a real lightning address to avoid potential confusion or unintended interactions.
- "payment_request": [null, "mostro_p2p@ln.tips"] + "payment_request": [null, "user@example.com"]
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (16)
.gitignore(1 hunks)src/SUMMARY.md(2 hunks)src/new_buy_order.md(1 hunks)src/new_buy_order_ln_address.md(1 hunks)src/new_sell_order.md(1 hunks)src/new_sell_range_order.md(1 hunks)src/order-event.md(1 hunks)src/order_event.md(1 hunks)src/overview.md(1 hunks)src/release.md(2 hunks)src/release_range_order.md(1 hunks)src/take_buy.md(1 hunks)src/take_buy_range_order.md(1 hunks)src/take_sell.md(1 hunks)src/take_sell_ln_address.md(1 hunks)src/take_sell_range_order.md(1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .gitignore
- src/order-event.md
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 LanguageTool
src/overview.md
[grammar] ~17-~17: A verb may be missing.
Context: ...ese fields are relative to the wrapper, here an example of a take-buy order messag...
(THERE_MISSING_VERB)
src/order_event.md
[style] ~5-~5: The phrase ‘in recent years’ is used quite frequently. Consider using a less frequent alternative to set your writing apart from others.
Context: ...eer (P2P) platforms have seen an upturn in recent years, while having more and more options is ...
(IN_RECENT_STYLE)
[uncategorized] ~53-~53: ‘Amount of’ should usually only be used with uncountable or mass nouns. Consider using “number” if this is not the case.
Context: ...ss, success. - amt` < Amount >: The amount of Bitcoin to be traded, the amount is ...
(AMOUNTOF_TO_NUMBEROF)
[uncategorized] ~62-~62: It appears that hyphens are missing.
Context: ...of the operation, it can be useful in a face to face trade. - bond [Bond]: The bond amount...
(FACE_TO_FACE_HYPHEN)
[uncategorized] ~63-~63: Possible missing comma found.
Context: .... - bond [Bond]: The bond amount, the bond is a security deposit that both parties...
(AI_HYDRA_LEO_MISSING_COMMA)
🔇 Additional comments (11)
src/overview.md (1)
24-26: LGTM! Well-structured documentation.The addition of the
trade_indexfield and its description is clear and well-documented. The example message structure effectively demonstrates the usage.src/release.md (1)
10-10: LGTM! Consistent request_id implementation.The addition of the
request_idfield is consistent across all relevant JSON examples.Also applies to: 26-26
src/new_sell_order.md (1)
10-10: Verify trade_index implementation detailsThe new
trade_indexfield appears to be added for trade tracking, but several aspects need clarification:
- Is the hardcoded value
1just an example, or should it be dynamic?- Should this field be reflected in the confirmation message and published event for consistency?
✅ Verification successful
Trade index implementation is properly documented
The
trade_indexfield is documented in overview.md as an optional field used for reputation tracking, representing the index of the trade in user's trade history. The value1is just an example, as evidenced by other examples using2for subsequent trades. Its absence in confirmations and events is appropriate given its optional nature and user-tracking purpose.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for other occurrences of trade_index to understand its usage rg -i "trade_index" --type mdLength of output: 1084
src/new_buy_order_ln_address.md (1)
10-10: Document trade_index behavior with lightning addressesThe
trade_indexfield has been added, but its relationship with lightning address functionality needs clarification:
- Does the trade index play any role in lightning address resolution or payment tracking?
- How is the trade index used when multiple payments are made to the same lightning address?
src/take_sell_range_order.md (1)
11-11: Clarify trade_index behavior with range ordersThe
trade_indexfield has been added to range orders, but its behavior needs clarification:
- Does the trade index remain constant when taking partial amounts from a range order?
- How is the trade index used to track multiple takes from the same range order?
✅ Verification successful
Trade index increments with each range order split
The
trade_indexfield works as follows with range orders:
- Initial takes use
trade_index: 1- When a partial amount is taken, a child order is created for the remaining amount
- The child order gets an incremented
trade_index(e.g., 2)- This ensures each partial take can be tracked separately in the user's trade history for reputation purposes
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for range order documentation mentioning trade index rg -i "range.*order.*trade.?index|trade.?index.*range" --type mdLength of output: 66
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for trade_index in all files echo "=== Trade Index Usage ===" rg -i "trade.?index" -A 3 echo -e "\n=== Range Order Files ===" fd "range.*order" --type f echo -e "\n=== Range Order Tests ===" fd "test.*range.*order|range.*order.*test" --type fLength of output: 3730
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Examine range order implementation details echo "=== Release Range Order Content ===" cat src/release_range_order.md echo -e "\n=== Take Range Order Content ===" cat src/take_sell_range_order.md cat src/take_buy_range_order.mdLength of output: 5264
src/new_buy_order.md (1)
10-10: Document trade_index behavior with different invoice creation methodsThe
trade_indexfield has been added, but its interaction with the two invoice creation methods needs clarification:
- Does the trade index behave differently for orders with known amounts vs. amountless invoices?
- How is the trade index used when an amountless invoice is later updated with an amount?
src/take_sell.md (1)
11-11: Document trade_index behavior across order statesThe
trade_indexfield has been added to the initial take-sell action, but its behavior across order states needs clarification:
- Should the trade_index be included in subsequent state change messages?
- How is the trade_index used to track the order through different states (waiting-buyer-invoice, waiting-payment, etc.)?
src/take_buy.md (1)
11-11: Verify trade_index implementation across message typesThe addition of
trade_indexneeds clarification:
- What is the purpose of this field?
- How should implementations handle this value?
- Is this a required field for all order types?
Let's verify the consistency across message types:
✅ Verification successful
Optional field for tracking user trade history
The
trade_indexis an optional field used for maintaining user reputation, representing the sequential index of the trade in the user's trade history. No changes are needed as the implementation is consistent across message types.🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for trade_index usage across all markdown files echo "Checking trade_index usage across message types..." rg -A 2 -B 2 '"trade_index"' 'src/*.md'Length of output: 201
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Find markdown files and search for trade_index echo "Finding all markdown files in src directory..." fd -e md . src/ echo -e "\nSearching for trade_index in markdown files..." fd -e md . src/ -x rg -i -A 2 -B 2 'trade_?index' echo -e "\nSearching for any documentation about trade index..." fd -e md . src/ -x rg -i 'trade.?index.*purpose|trade.?index.*description|trade.?index.*field'Length of output: 3974
src/SUMMARY.md (1)
19-19: LGTM!The changes maintain a logical structure and consistent naming conventions.
Also applies to: 29-29
src/release_range_order.md (1)
35-35: Clarify trade_index increment logicThe documentation should explain the relationship between trade indices. In the example, we see
trade_index: 2, which appears to be incremented from the previous value. Consider adding a note explaining:
- How trade_index values are determined
- Whether they must be sequential
- Any constraints on valid values
Also applies to: 42-42
src/new_sell_range_order.md (1)
Line range hint
15-19: Consider adding amount constraints validationThe documentation should specify validation rules for the amount fields:
- Ensure min_amount > 0
- Validate that max_amount > min_amount
- Consider documenting any upper limits
| - `amt` < Amount >: The amount of Bitcoin to be traded, the amount is defined in satoshis, if `0` means that the amount of satoshis will be obtained from a public API after the taker accepts the order. | ||
| - `fa` < Fiat amount >: The fiat amount being traded, for range orders two values are expected, the minimum and maximum amount. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Clarify amount specifications
The description of amount fields needs more precision:
-`amt` < Amount >: The amount of Bitcoin to be traded, the amount is defined in satoshis, if `0` means that the amount of satoshis will be obtained from a public API after the taker accepts the order.
+`amt` < Amount >: The number of satoshis to be traded. A value of `0` indicates that the exact amount will be determined via a public API after order acceptance.
-`fa` < Fiat amount >: The fiat amount being traded, for range orders two values are expected, the minimum and maximum amount.
+`fa` < Fiat amount >: The fiat amount being traded. For range orders, specify as ["min_amount", "max_amount"]. Values must be positive numbers.📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - `amt` < Amount >: The amount of Bitcoin to be traded, the amount is defined in satoshis, if `0` means that the amount of satoshis will be obtained from a public API after the taker accepts the order. | |
| - `fa` < Fiat amount >: The fiat amount being traded, for range orders two values are expected, the minimum and maximum amount. | |
| - `amt` < Amount >: The number of satoshis to be traded. A value of `0` indicates that the exact amount will be determined via a public API after order acceptance. | |
| - `fa` < Fiat amount >: The fiat amount being traded. For range orders, specify as ["min_amount", "max_amount"]. Values must be positive numbers. |
🧰 Tools
🪛 LanguageTool
[uncategorized] ~53-~53: ‘Amount of’ should usually only be used with uncountable or mass nouns. Consider using “number” if this is not the case.
Context: ...ss, success. - amt` < Amount >: The amount of Bitcoin to be traded, the amount is ...
(AMOUNTOF_TO_NUMBEROF)
Include trade-index in some messages
Small fixes
Summary by CodeRabbit
Documentation Updates
trade_indexfieldNew Features
trade_indexto order creation and taking processes across multiple order typesChores
book/directory to.gitignore