[IOPS-3679] Updated constraint profiles#218
Conversation
|
@KazeemHamzat, would you be able to check the StructureDefinitions in Forge? The branch is failing validation but I expect this is due to the number of dependencies rather than the files themselves as they are just timing out |
|
@KazeemHamzat, Validation issues fixed |
Removed SD from file names to conform to guidance
KazeemHamzat
left a comment
KazeemHamzat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Is the use of 'targetProfile' returned or just used in some required places?
- Only Genomics profiles and base HL7 are listed on some profile with UKCore. as base definition. Not a problem as we not recommending stating conformance in meta.profile. Hopefully, no one will mistakenly reference UKCore profile.
- Something to do later for conformance to Dev. guidance and consistency: Updating Metadata to align with Dev. guidance
|
@KazeemHamzat, I've updated the profiles to match the metadata guidance. Regarding targetProfile, for these I've just added references to key profiles resources should conform to but I haven't removed the inherited profiles so these constraints are for information only at this point. I've updated the CapabilityStatements to confirm which profiles resources should validate against so there should not be an issue with regards to declared meta.profile elements, as the implementation will only use the capability statement for validation Hopefully this answers your comments |
2 participants
No description provided.