-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
Niad 2122 ambulance input #255
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
…lence form and submissions to back end.
This reverts commit 53fd019.
…aptor-111 into NIAD-2122_Ambulance_Input
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| label: "Recipient Name", | ||
| id: "recipient-name", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does not appear in ITK message.
Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| label: "Recipient Address Line 1", | ||
| id: "recipient-street-address-line-1", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does not appear in ITK message.
Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| label: "Recipient Address Line 2", | ||
| id: "recipient-street-address-line-2", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does not appear in ITK message.
Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| label: "Recipient Town", | ||
| id: "recipient-street-address-town", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does not appear in ITK message.
Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| label: "Recipient City", | ||
| id: "recipient-street-address-city", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does not appear in ITK message.
Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below
| }, | ||
| { | ||
| label: "Recipient Postcode", | ||
| id: "recipient-street-address-postcode", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does not appear in ITK message.
Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below
…NIAD-2122_Ambulance_Input
No description provided.