Skip to content

Conversation

@hodge70
Copy link
Contributor

@hodge70 hodge70 commented Jul 8, 2022

No description provided.

},
{
label: "Recipient Name",
id: "recipient-name",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not appear in ITK message.

Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below

},
{
label: "Recipient Address Line 1",
id: "recipient-street-address-line-1",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not appear in ITK message.

Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below

},
{
label: "Recipient Address Line 2",
id: "recipient-street-address-line-2",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not appear in ITK message.

Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below

},
{
label: "Recipient Town",
id: "recipient-street-address-town",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not appear in ITK message.

Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below

},
{
label: "Recipient City",
id: "recipient-street-address-city",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not appear in ITK message.

Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below

},
{
label: "Recipient Postcode",
id: "recipient-street-address-postcode",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does not appear in ITK message.

Could you update the ITK message with the missing field, other ITK messages should have the field within them... syntax should be along the lines of @@id@@.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

  • Placed on wrong line, this is for the case below

@SRAlexander SRAlexander merged commit e9e654a into master Jul 14, 2022
@SRAlexander SRAlexander deleted the NIAD-2122_Ambulance_Input branch July 14, 2022 08:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants