Replies: 1 comment 4 replies
|
OK I looked at the model a bit and I have a thought -- in this system, there are two fates for the discards: pelagic detritus and benthic detritus. So I think we have two columns here representing the amount of biomass flowing to each detrital compartment. BUT this is definitely not clear from the way the output is labeled / named so I wonder if we can adjust that. Also I am still trying to figure out why the total does not reflect the sum of the other two columns here... I quickly tried the extract.node function on my Gulf of Maine model and I got an expected result (but I only have one detrital pathway in my model). @kaydin curious for your thoughts |
4 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I have been using one of the lazy loaded data objects (
Ecosense.EBS) and extracting some info for squids. (see below)Created on 2025-02-03 with reprex v2.1.0
The output for
groups$Discardsi think indicates (with my limited understanding) that there are TWO fisheries/gears that create discards for SQUID (... and both fisheries have the same name!) . But, when i look at the Rpath object above (Rpath$NUM_GEARS) there is only one fishery specified in the model.This (error?) seems to result in propogating the
Rsim.output$Gear_Catch_sp,Rsim.output$Gear_Catch_gear,Rsim.output$Gear_Catch_dispIs this correct? Can someone verify? Thanks
All reactions