Remove getArgsNumAfterSegmentRuns by wujingyue · Pull Request #4122 · NVIDIA/Fuser

wujingyue · 2025-03-21T11:43:18Z

Instead, check peak memory directly. The utilities will be used for verifying deallocation in host IR.

https://testing.googleblog.com/2013/08/testing-on-toilet-test-behavior-not.html

tests/cpp/test_gpu3.cpp

github-actions · 2025-03-21T13:10:54Z

Review updated until commit bc197eb

Description

Removed getArgsNumAfterSegmentRuns method
Moved memory leak check to the test
Added memory allocation tracking utilities
Updated test to verify memory deallocation

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files

Enhancement

5 files

global_allocator.cpp `Reset tensor and allocated bytes in Arena`	+3/-2
fusion_kernel_runtime.cpp `Remove tracking of live arguments after segment runs`	+0/-4
utils.cpp `Add memory allocation tracking utilities`	+53/-5
fusion_kernel_runtime.h Remove `getArgsNumAfterSegmentRuns` method	+0/-10
utils.h `Declare memory allocation tracking utilities`	+10/-0

Formatting

3 files

test_multidevice_overlap.cpp `Reorder member variable declaration`	+2/-1
validator.cpp `Remove unused include`	+0/-1
CMakeLists.txt Fix formatting in `add_test_without_main` function	+2/-1

Tests

1 files

test_runtime.cpp `Add memory allocation checks in test`	+31/-22

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

🧪 PR contains tests

⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

Performance Impact

The removal of getArgsNumAfterSegmentRuns and the associated checks in the tests might impact the ability to verify that intermediate tensors are being properly deallocated. Ensure that the new method of checking peak memory directly is sufficient to catch memory leaks or excessive memory usage.

      args, runtime_workspace_, segmented_fusion_->inputs());

  // group should share cache id.
  auto group_cache_id = args.getCacheId();

  const int64_t num_groups = (int64_t)runtime_workspace_.group_run_order.size();
  if (isProfilerEnabled()) {
    FusionProfiler::startCompile();
  }

  // host ir
  std::unique_ptr<hir::HostIrContainer> hic;
  if (isOptionEnabled(EnableOption::HostIrLowering)) {
    hic = std::make_unique<hir::HostIrContainer>(
        num_groups); // Some indices will be empty
  }

  std::atomic<bool> detect_exception_in_thread_pool{false};
  std::string thread_pool_error_message;
  std::mutex thread_pool_error_message_mutex;
  for (int64_t run_order_id = 0; run_order_id < num_groups; ++run_order_id) {
    auto group_to_run = runtime_workspace_.group_run_order.at(run_order_id);

    if (isDebugDumpEnabled(DebugDumpOption::PythonDefinitionSegments)) {
      debug() << "Python definition for segmented group "
              << group_to_run->groupId() << ":" << std::endl;
      python_frontend::FusionDefinition fd(/*id=*/std::nullopt);
      python_frontend::translate(group_to_run->getFusion(), &fd);
      fd.print(debug());
    }

    // TODO: index mode should be updated per segmented kernel
    // Prepare input vector
    auto group_runtime_inputs =
        args_manager.translateValsToArgs(group_to_run->inputs());
    group_runtime_inputs.setDeviceIndex(args.getDeviceIndex());
    if (group_cache_id.has_value()) {
      group_runtime_inputs.setCacheId(group_cache_id.value());
    }

    if (num_groups == 1 || isOptionDisabled(DisableOption::ParallelCompile)) {
      FUSER_PERF_SCOPE("FusionKernelRuntime::compileFusionParallel");
      c10::cuda::CUDAGuard dg(args.getDeviceIndex());
      c10::Device device(c10::DeviceType::CUDA, args.getDeviceIndex());
      compileKernel(group_runtime_inputs, group_to_run, hic.get());
    } else {
      hir::HostIrContainer* hic_ptr = hic.get();
      // launch compileKernel thread here
      getThreadPool()->run([this,
                            args,
                            group_runtime_inputs,
                            group_to_run,
                            &detect_exception_in_thread_pool,
                            &thread_pool_error_message,
                            &thread_pool_error_message_mutex,
                            hic_ptr]() {
        FUSER_PERF_SCOPE("FusionKernelRuntime::compileFusionParallel");
        try {
          c10::cuda::CUDAGuard dg(args.getDeviceIndex());
          c10::Device device(c10::DeviceType::CUDA, args.getDeviceIndex());
          compileKernel(group_runtime_inputs, group_to_run, hic_ptr);
        } catch (const std::exception& e) {
          // Set flag inside lambda so we can throw an exception after thread
          // pool completes its work.
          detect_exception_in_thread_pool.store(true);
          const std::lock_guard<std::mutex> lock(
              thread_pool_error_message_mutex);
          std::stringstream ss;
          ss << thread_pool_error_message << "\nError from segmentation group "
             << group_to_run->groupId() << ": " << e.what() << "\n";
          thread_pool_error_message = ss.str();
        }
      });
    }

    auto fusion_to_run = segmented_fusion_->makeFusion(group_to_run).second;
    auto group_runtime_outputs =
        inferOutputSizes(fusion_to_run.get(), group_runtime_inputs);

    // map output args to tensor map
    args_manager.updateWithSegmentOutputs(
        group_to_run->outputs(), group_runtime_outputs, run_order_id);
  }

  // add all expressions and compiled kernels to the host ir container
  if (hic != nullptr) {
    IrCloner ir_cloner(hic.get());
    FusionGuard::setCurFusion(hic.get());
    for (int64_t run_order_id = 0; run_order_id < num_groups; ++run_order_id) {
      auto group_to_run = runtime_workspace_.group_run_order.at(run_order_id);
      if (hic->hasKernelExecutor(run_order_id)) {
        auto in_clone = ir_cloner.clone(group_to_run->inputs());
        auto out_clone = ir_cloner.clone(group_to_run->outputs());
        auto heuristic_params = schedulers().at(run_order_id).get();
        auto launch_kernel = IrBuilder::create<hir::LaunchKernel>(
            run_order_id,
            heuristic_params->lparams,
            heuristic_params->cparams,
            std::vector<Val*>{in_clone},
            std::vector<Val*>{out_clone});
        hic->pushBackTopLevelExprs(launch_kernel);
      } else {
        // push back segment's exprs into the container as top level expressions
        for (auto* expr : group_to_run->exprs()) {
          auto cloned_expr = ir_cloner.clone(expr);
          hic->pushBackTopLevelExprs(cloned_expr);
        }
      }
    }
    for (const Val* in : segmented_fusion_->inputs()) {
      hic->addInput(ir_cloner.clone(in));
    }
    for (const Val* out : segmented_fusion_->outputs()) {
      hic->addOutput(ir_cloner.clone(out));
    }
  }

  if (num_groups != 1 && !isOptionDisabled(DisableOption::ParallelCompile)) {
    // Wait until all segments finish compiling
    getThreadPool()->waitWorkComplete();
    NVF_ERROR(
        !detect_exception_in_thread_pool.load(),
        "Detected exception while compiling fusion segments in parallel. ",
        "Error messages from all threads are printed below.\n",
        thread_pool_error_message,
        "\nUse NVFUSER_DISABLE=parallel_compile to simplify error message.");
  }

  if (hic != nullptr) {
    hie_ = std::make_unique<hir::HostIrEvaluator>(
        hir::HostIrEvaluator(std::move(hic)));
  }

  if (isProfilerEnabled()) {
    FusionProfiler::stopCompile();
  }
}

void FusionKernelRuntime::disableKernelLaunch() {
  NVF_CHECK(
      isCompiled(),
      "Tried to set parameters of executors before they were initialized.");
  for (auto& executor : executors_) {
    if (auto ke = dynamic_cast<KernelExecutor*>(executor.get())) {
      ke->setExecuteKernelFlag(false);
    }
  }
}

SegmentedFusion* FusionKernelRuntime::fusionSegments() const {
  return segmented_fusion_.get();
}

HeuristicParamsList* FusionKernelRuntime::schedulerHeuristics() const {
  return heuristics_.get();
}

const ExecutorLog& FusionKernelRuntime::getMostRecentExecutorLog() const {
  NVF_ERROR(profiling_, "Executor log is only produced in profiling mode");
  return most_recent_executor_log_;
}

std::optional<std::unique_ptr<HeuristicParamsList>> FusionKernelRuntime::
    getMaybeHeuristicsFor(
        const KernelArgumentHolder& args,
        std::optional<PrimDataType> forced_index_type) {
  FUSER_PERF_SCOPE("FusionKernelRuntime::getMaybeHeuristicsFor");

  // The runtime group run order is different from the segmented_fusion group
  // order. Instead of using HeuristicParamsList::emplaceBack, we initialize
  // HeuristicParamsList with the desired number of groups.
  const int64_t num_groups = (int64_t)runtime_workspace_.group_run_order.size();
  std::unique_ptr<HeuristicParamsList> heuristics =
      std::make_unique<HeuristicParamsList>(num_groups);

  // We make a mutable copy of args so that we can use it in an
  // ArgumentManager
  ArgumentManager args_manager(
      args, runtime_workspace_, segmented_fusion_->inputs());
  // Follow group run order
  for (int64_t group_id : c10::irange(num_groups)) {
    auto group_to_run = runtime_workspace_.group_run_order.at(group_id);

    // Create fusion for this segmented group
    Fusion* fusion_to_run = group_to_run->getFusion();
    NVF_ERROR(fusion_to_run != nullptr);
    FusionGuard fg(fusion_to_run);

    // Get input arguments for SchedulerRuntimeInfo
    KernelArgumentHolder group_runtime_inputs =
        args_manager.translateValsToArgs(group_to_run->inputs());
    group_runtime_inputs.setDeviceIndex(args.getDeviceIndex());

    // Create PrecomputedValues for fusion segment
    std::unique_ptr<PrecomputedValues> evaluator_precomputed_values;
    {
      FUSER_PERF_SCOPE(
          "FusionKernelRuntime::getMaybeHeuristicsFor::PrecomputedValues");
      evaluator_precomputed_values =
          std::make_unique<PrecomputedValues>(fusion_to_run);
      evaluator_precomputed_values->bindInputs(group_runtime_inputs);
      // TODO Remove binding the original fusion inputs when creating
      // heuristics for fusion segment.
      evaluator_precomputed_values->bindValues(
          group_to_run->getCompleteFusionInputs(), args);
      evaluator_precomputed_values->evaluate();
    }

    // Get all tensorviews for segmented fusion
    std::vector<TensorView*> all_tvs_for_fusion_to_run =
        fusion_to_run->allTvs();

    SchedulerRuntimeInfo fusion_to_run_info(
        fusion_to_run,
        group_runtime_inputs,
        evaluator_precomputed_values.get(),
        all_tvs_for_fusion_to_run,
        forced_index_type);

    if (heuristics_ == nullptr) {
      // Add new scheduler entry for this segmented group
      heuristics->at(group_to_run->groupId()) =
          segmented_fusion_->makeInitialHeuristicParams(
              group_to_run, fusion_to_run_info);
    } else {
      // Try to get scheduler entry
      // NOTE: we are able to skip compile time checks here since the fusion
      // has already been segmented. During segmentation, each segment must
      // pass both canScheduleCompileTime and canScheduleRuntime for the
      // scheduler that accepts the segment. Since we might have different
      // runtime info than was used during segmentation, we cannot skip
      // canScheduleRuntime, but it is safe to skip canScheduleCompileTime. We
      // skip it here to avoid performing expensive fusion traversals on the
      // dynamic shape path.
      auto maybe_heuristic_params =
          group_to_run->getMaybeHeuristicParams(fusion_to_run_info);
      // If unavailable, then return std::nullopt
      if (!maybe_heuristic_params.has_value()) {
        return std::nullopt;
      }
      // Check if this scheduler entry matches the previous entry for this
      // segmented group. If no match, then return std::nullptr
      auto heuristic_params = std::move(maybe_heuristic_params.value());
      if (!heuristic_params->sameAs(
              heuristics_->at(group_to_run->groupId()).get())) {
        return std::nullopt;
      }
      // Add new scheduler entry for this segmented group
      heuristics->at(group_to_run->groupId()) = std::move(heuristic_params);
    }

    // Generate metadata for the fusion's outputs
    auto group_runtime_outputs = inferOutputSizes(
        fusion_to_run,
        group_runtime_inputs,
        evaluator_precomputed_values.get());

    args_manager.updateWithSegmentOutputs(
        group_to_run->outputs(), group_runtime_outputs, group_id);
  }
  return heuristics;
}

void FusionKernelRuntime::updateHeuristicsLaunchParams(
    HeuristicParamsList* update_heuristics) {
  auto scheduler_list_length = heuristics_->heuristicsList().size();
  NVF_ERROR(
      update_heuristics->heuristicsList().size() == scheduler_list_length);
  for (const auto i : c10::irange(scheduler_list_length)) {
    auto& heuristic_params = heuristics_->heuristicsList()[i];
    heuristic_params->lparams = update_heuristics->heuristicsList()[i]->lparams;
  }
}

const std::vector<std::unique_ptr<ExecutorAbstract>>& FusionKernelRuntime::
    executors() const {
  return executors_;
}

std::unordered_map<Val*, PolymorphicValue> FusionKernelRuntime::
    runSegmentsWithInputs(KernelArgumentHolder& args) {
  FUSER_PERF_SCOPE("FusionKernelRuntime::runSegmentsWithInputs");
  NVF_ERROR(
      args.size() == segmented_fusion_->inputs().size(),
      "Inputs were not set up correctly, received ",
      args.size(),
      " inputs but expected ",
      segmented_fusion_->inputs().size());

  ArgumentManager args_manager(
      args, runtime_workspace_, segmented_fusion_->inputs());

  // group should share cache id.
  auto group_cache_id = args.getCacheId();
  const int64_t num_groups = (int64_t)runtime_workspace_.group_run_order.size();
  kernel_time_ms_ = 0;
  for (auto run_order_id : c10::irange(num_groups)) {
    // TODO: index mode should be updated per segmented kernel
    // Prepare input vector
    auto group_to_run = runtime_workspace_.group_run_order.at(run_order_id);
    KernelArgumentHolder group_runtime_inputs =
        args_manager.translateValsToArgs(group_to_run->inputs());
    group_runtime_inputs.setDeviceIndex(args.getDeviceIndex());
    if (group_cache_id.has_value()) {
      group_runtime_inputs.setCacheId(group_cache_id.value());
    }

    // TODO: currently we are still outputing PyTorch tensors, instead of
    // something abstract. This is quite unsatisfying.

    // Run graph segment
    KernelArgumentHolder group_runtime_outputs =
        runKernelWithInput(group_runtime_inputs, group_to_run);

    args_manager.updateWithSegmentOutputs(
        group_to_run->outputs(), group_runtime_outputs, run_order_id);
  }

  if (isProfilerEnabled()) {
    int64_t input_bytes = 0;
    for (auto* inp : fusionSegments()->inputs()) {
      if (inp->isA<TensorView>()) {

Test Coverage

The new test ClearGmemBetweenSegments should be thoroughly reviewed to ensure it covers all scenarios that the old test FusionClearGmemBetweenSegments_CUDA covered. Verify that the new test accurately checks for memory deallocation and peak memory usage.

TEST_F(RuntimeTest, ClearGmemBetweenSegments) {
  at::cuda::clearCublasWorkspaces();
  releaseZeroedMemory();
  ASSERT_EQ(memoryAllocated(0), 0) << "Previous tests leaked memory.";

  auto fusion = std::make_unique<Fusion>();
  FusionGuard fg(fusion.get());
  std::vector<int64_t> input_shape{32, 64, 8, 128};
  auto tv0 = TensorViewBuilder()
                 .ndims(input_shape.size())
                 .dtype(DataType::Double)
                 .build();
  fusion->addInput(tv0);
  auto tv1 = add(tv0, IrBuilder::create<Val>(1.0)); // Group 0
  auto tv2 = sum(tv1, {0}); // Group 0
  auto tv3 = sum(tv2, {-1}); // Group 1
  auto output = sum(tv3, {0}); // Group 2
  fusion->addOutput(output);

  resetPeakMemoryStats(0);
  ASSERT_EQ(maxMemoryAllocated(0), 0) << "No tensors are allocated so far.";

  auto options = at::TensorOptions().dtype(at::kDouble).device(at::kCUDA, 0);
  at::Tensor at_x = at::randn(input_shape, options);
  FusionExecutorCache executor_cache(std::move(fusion));
  auto outputs = executor_cache.runFusionWithInputs({at_x});
  const int64_t max_memory_allocated = maxMemoryAllocated(0);

  auto runtime = executor_cache.getMostRecentKernelRuntime();
  EXPECT_EQ(runtime->fusionSegments()->groups().size(), 3)
      << "segmentation didn't happen as expected";
  testValidate(executor_cache.fusion(), outputs, {at_x}, __LINE__, __FILE__);

  if (c10::utils::check_env("PYTORCH_NO_CUDA_MEMORY_CACHING") == true) {
    GTEST_SKIP() << "Skipped because PYTORCH_NO_CUDA_MEMORY_CACHING is on. "
                    "This usually happens when running with compute-sanitizer. "
                    "maxMemoryAllocated can only collect peak memory "
                    "from a caching allocator.";
  }

  EXPECT_EQ(
      max_memory_allocated,
      (32 * 64 * 8 * 128 + 64 * 8 * 128 + 64 * 8) * sizeof(double))
      << "tv0 (32 * 64 * 8 * 128) outlived the execution, so it contributes "
         "to the peak memory. tv1 was never allocated because it's internal "
         "to group 0. tv2 (64 * 8 * 128) and tv3 (64 * 8) were both alive "
         "when executing group 1.";
}

} // namespace nvfuser

Memory Management

The new functions resetPeakMemoryStats, maxMemoryAllocated, and memoryAllocated should be reviewed for correctness and efficiency. Ensure they accurately reflect the memory usage and peak memory allocation on the specified device.

void resetPeakMemoryStats(const c10::DeviceIndex device) {
  c10::cuda::CUDACachingAllocator::CUDAAllocator* allocator =
      c10::cuda::CUDACachingAllocator::get();
  NVF_CHECK(allocator != nullptr);

  allocator->resetPeakStats(device);
}

namespace {
// Stats like allocated_bytes comes as a size-3 array (cf.
// https://github.com/pytorch/pytorch/blob/feb503c1df78afd46962ed04e446d6e88ac0522d/c10/core/Allocator.h#L365-L370).
// The 0-th element is an aggregation of both the small pool and the large.
constexpr auto kAggregateStatsIndex = static_cast<uint64_t>(
#if NVF_TORCH_VERSION_NO_LESS(2, 7, 0)
    c10::CachingAllocator::StatType::AGGREGATE
#else
    c10::CachingDeviceAllocator::StatType::AGGREGATE
#endif
);
} // namespace

int64_t maxMemoryAllocated(const c10::DeviceIndex device) {
  c10::cuda::CUDACachingAllocator::CUDAAllocator* allocator =
      c10::cuda::CUDACachingAllocator::get();
  NVF_CHECK(allocator != nullptr);

  c10::CachingDeviceAllocator::DeviceStats device_stats =
      allocator->getDeviceStats(device);

  return device_stats.allocated_bytes.at(kAggregateStatsIndex).peak;
}

int64_t memoryAllocated(const c10::DeviceIndex device) {
  c10::cuda::CUDACachingAllocator::CUDAAllocator* allocator =
      c10::cuda::CUDACachingAllocator::get();
  NVF_CHECK(allocator != nullptr);

  c10::CachingDeviceAllocator::DeviceStats device_stats =
      allocator->getDeviceStats(device);

  return device_stats.allocated_bytes.at(kAggregateStatsIndex).current;
}

} // namespace nvfuser

wujingyue · 2025-03-21T20:38:16Z

!test

tests/cpp/utils.cpp

wujingyue · 2025-03-21T23:29:15Z

!test

wujingyue · 2025-03-22T00:15:59Z

!test

wujingyue · 2025-03-22T00:17:46Z

tests/cpp/test_runtime.cpp

+  at::cuda::clearCublasWorkspaces();
+  releaseZeroedMemory();
+  ASSERT_EQ(memoryAllocated(0), 0) << "Memory leak detected";


We can also do this in TearDown of all tests so we can verify none of them leak GPU memory. I'm happy to pursue that in a separate PR because the blast radius is larger.

wujingyue · 2025-03-24T19:02:15Z

!test

wujingyue · 2025-03-24T23:10:24Z

!test

jjsjann123 · 2025-03-25T21:52:52Z

csrc/global_allocator.cpp

    }
-    allocated_bytes_ = 0LL;
+    allocated_bytes_ = 0;
+    tensor_.reset();


jjsjann123 · 2025-03-25T21:55:54Z

tests/cpp/test_multidevice_overlap.cpp

    return tc_unsharded_expected_reshaped.select(1, my_device_index_);
  }
+
+  at::Tensor tc_locally_reduced_;


tests/cpp/utils.cpp

wujingyue · 2025-03-25T22:19:32Z

!build

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/cpp/test_gpu3.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

wujingyue added 5 commits March 21, 2025 05:06

WIP

9f04f9e

WIP

e7b9612

WIP

835a19c

lintrunner

0ba96a0

WIP

78191c9

wujingyue force-pushed the wjy/alloc branch from f9acb7f to 78191c9 Compare March 21, 2025 13:10

Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/main' into wjy/alloc

b6194a8

wujingyue force-pushed the wjy/alloc branch from 79da05f to b6194a8 Compare March 21, 2025 20:35

Minor

9533e09

Remove getArgsNumAfterSegmentRuns

66539d2

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025

View reviewed changes

tests/cpp/utils.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

wujingyue requested a review from nsarka March 21, 2025 21:00

wujingyue marked this pull request as ready for review March 21, 2025 21:00

Move memory leak check to the test

25c06b9

wujingyue force-pushed the wjy/alloc branch from 092b0af to 25c06b9 Compare March 22, 2025 00:15

wujingyue commented Mar 22, 2025

View reviewed changes

wujingyue requested a review from naoyam March 22, 2025 00:17

Merge branch 'main' into wjy/alloc

4861470

Fix a test

c86d8e9

wujingyue requested a review from jjsjann123 March 25, 2025 15:06

jjsjann123 reviewed Mar 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

Fix 2.6

bc197eb

wujingyue requested a review from jjsjann123 March 25, 2025 22:20

jjsjann123 approved these changes Mar 25, 2025

View reviewed changes

wujingyue merged commit a0ce36a into main Mar 25, 2025
16 checks passed

wujingyue deleted the wjy/alloc branch March 25, 2025 22:57

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Remove getArgsNumAfterSegmentRuns#4122

Remove getArgsNumAfterSegmentRuns#4122
wujingyue merged 12 commits intomainfrom
wjy/alloc

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 22, 2025

Uh oh!

wujingyue Mar 22, 2025

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 24, 2025

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 24, 2025

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 Mar 25, 2025

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 Mar 25, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 25, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Description

Changes walkthrough 📝

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 22, 2025

Uh oh!

wujingyue Mar 22, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 24, 2025

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 24, 2025

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 Mar 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

jjsjann123 Mar 25, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

wujingyue commented Mar 25, 2025

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

wujingyue commented Mar 21, 2025 •

edited

Loading

github-actions bot commented Mar 21, 2025 •

edited

Loading