Skip to content

Establish reviewers for training code#3765

Merged
maanug-nv merged 5 commits intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
maanug-nv:maanug/training-review
Mar 17, 2026
Merged

Establish reviewers for training code#3765
maanug-nv merged 5 commits intoNVIDIA:mainfrom
maanug-nv:maanug/training-review

Conversation

@maanug-nv
Copy link
Contributor

@maanug-nv maanug-nv commented Mar 10, 2026

What does this PR do ?

Training code will only require final review.

⚠️ For major changes (either in lines of code or in its impact), please make sure to first share a design doc with the team. If you're unsure what's the best way to do so, contact the @mcore-oncall.

Contribution process

Pre-checks

  • I have added relevant unit tests
  • I have added relevant functional tests
  • I have added proper typing to my code Typing guidelines
  • I have added relevant documentation
  • I have run the autoformatter.sh on my PR

Code review

Feel free to message or comment the @mcore-oncall to help accelerate your merge into main. The less complex your PR is, the faster it will be approved and merged!

All PRs start as draft. If you open a non-draft PR, it will be automatically converted to draft.

Step 1: Mark PR as "Ready for Review"

  1. When your PR is ready, click Ready for Review.
  2. An oncall reviewer is auto-assigned and expert reviewers are notified based on your changes.
    • Some PRs may jump straight to step 2. This is determined by .github/CODEOWNERS.

⚠️ Only mark as ready once merge-conflicts are resolved and the CI is passing.
Final Review might get declined if these requirements are not fulfilled.

Step 2: Final Review

For PRs that change megatron/core, once all expert reviewers have approved, the Final Review label is applied automatically and final reviewers are assigned.

For PRs outside megatron/core, this step is skipped.

Step 3: Approved

Once all required reviewers have approved, the Approved label is applied automatically.

Merge

Any member of mcore-engineers will be able to merge your PR.

For MRs into `dev` branch The proposed review process for `dev` branch is under active discussion.

MRs are mergable after one approval by either eharper@nvidia.com or zijiey@nvidia.com.

@copy-pr-bot
Copy link

copy-pr-bot bot commented Mar 10, 2026

Auto-sync is disabled for draft pull requests in this repository. Workflows must be run manually.

Contributors can view more details about this message here.

@maanug-nv maanug-nv requested a review from Phlip79 March 10, 2026 02:23
@maanug-nv maanug-nv marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 02:24
@maanug-nv maanug-nv requested a review from a team as a code owner March 10, 2026 02:24
@svcnvidia-nemo-ci svcnvidia-nemo-ci added this to the Core 0.16 milestone Mar 10, 2026
@svcnvidia-nemo-ci svcnvidia-nemo-ci requested a review from a team March 10, 2026 02:24
@maanug-nv maanug-nv marked this pull request as draft March 10, 2026 02:24
@maanug-nv
Copy link
Contributor Author

undraft once core-training has access to this repo

@maanug-nv maanug-nv linked an issue Mar 10, 2026 that may be closed by this pull request
@maanug-nv maanug-nv changed the title Add core-training group to review process Establish reviewers for training code Mar 10, 2026
@maanug-nv maanug-nv marked this pull request as ready for review March 10, 2026 16:12
@maanug-nv maanug-nv force-pushed the maanug/training-review branch from da4a8e5 to b0acb3e Compare March 10, 2026 16:16
@maanug-nv maanug-nv requested a review from ko3n1g March 10, 2026 17:38
@svcnvidia-nemo-ci svcnvidia-nemo-ci added the Approved All necessary approvals have been made label Mar 10, 2026
@Phlip79
Copy link
Member

Phlip79 commented Mar 10, 2026

I think it would be best to create two new teams: training-nemo and training-adlr. The benefit is that these teams can be a different set of reviewers to reduce the burden of final reviewing of core-nemo and core-adlr.

@maanug-nv
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think it would be best to create two new teams: training-nemo and training-adlr. The benefit is that these teams can be a different set of reviewers to reduce the burden of final reviewing of core-nemo and core-adlr.

I think training-nemo and training-adlr would end up being similar/identical people to core-nemo and core-adlr, at least right now. Can we just expand core-nemo and core-adlr?

Signed-off-by: Maanu Grover <maanug@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Maanu Grover <maanug@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Maanu Grover <maanug@nvidia.com>
This reverts commit b0acb3e.
Signed-off-by: Maanu Grover <maanug@nvidia.com>
@maanug-nv maanug-nv force-pushed the maanug/training-review branch from ab37d74 to 27cbd19 Compare March 16, 2026 19:55
@maanug-nv maanug-nv added this pull request to the merge queue Mar 16, 2026
@svcnvidia-nemo-ci
Copy link

🔄 Merge queue validation started!

You can track the progress here: https://github.com/NVIDIA/Megatron-LM/actions/runs/23169967853

@svcnvidia-nemo-ci
Copy link

🔄 Merge queue validation started!

You can track the progress here: https://github.com/NVIDIA/Megatron-LM/actions/runs/23170131479

Merged via the queue into NVIDIA:main with commit c1a14fb Mar 17, 2026
83 of 84 checks passed
@maanug-nv maanug-nv deleted the maanug/training-review branch March 17, 2026 00:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Approved All necessary approvals have been made

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Establish review process for training code

5 participants