[None][doc] scaffolding tech blog part two#11841
Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughA new blog post is added documenting the joint optimization of multi-agent systems with TensorRT-LLM. The article covers Scaffolding, an inference-time framework for decoupling agent logic from LLM inference, with case studies on KV-cache management and batch scheduling. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~12 minutes 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings. ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
docs/source/blogs/tech_blog/blog17_Joint_Optimization_of_Agent_Applications_and_TensorRT-LLM.md (1)
216-216: Use a consistent section title: “Batch Scheduling”.Earlier you use “Case Study 2: Batch Scheduling”, but this subsection is titled “Batch Schedule”. Aligning terminology will improve scanability.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed. In `@docs/source/blogs/tech_blog/blog17_Joint_Optimization_of_Agent_Applications_and_TensorRT-LLM.md` at line 216, The subsection heading currently reads "Batch Schedule" but the rest of the doc uses "Batch Scheduling" (e.g., "Case Study 2: Batch Scheduling"); update the heading text to "Batch Scheduling" so terminology is consistent across the document, locating and replacing the heading string "Batch Schedule" in the markdown file (the line that currently starts with "### (II) Batch Schedule") with "### (II) Batch Scheduling".
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.
Inline comments:
In
`@docs/source/blogs/tech_blog/blog17_Joint_Optimization_of_Agent_Applications_and_TensorRT-LLM.md`:
- Around line 232-233: The paragraph is internally inconsistent: the sentence
"Burst agents will prevail over chatbots" conflicts with "Agent tree forces the
portion of scheduling slots to be 0.5 for agents and chatbots." Edit this
paragraph to clarify that "prevail" describes baseline behavior without the
agent tree (or another specific metric) and explicitly state that when the agent
tree is enabled it enforces a 0.5/0.5 scheduling split; revise or remove the
ambiguous phrase "Burst agents will prevail over chatbots" and ensure both
statements consistently refer to either baseline or agent-tree-enabled behavior
(search for the phrases "Burst agents will prevail over chatbots" and "Agent
tree forces the portion of scheduling slots to be 0.5" to locate and update the
text).
- Around line 51-57: The snippet in the Supervisor example references undefined
identifiers (researcher_controllers, kwargs_list) while only initializing
research_tasks_list; fix by either (A) defining researcher_controllers and
kwargs_list in the snippet so it's runnable (for example derive
researcher_controllers from your researcher objects and populate kwargs_list in
parallel with research_tasks_list), or (B) explicitly mark the block as
pseudocode in the docs and remove or replace the call to ParallelProcess to
avoid copy/paste breakage; update the Supervisor snippet to include these
definitions or a clear pseudocode disclaimer so readers can reproduce the
example.
---
Nitpick comments:
In
`@docs/source/blogs/tech_blog/blog17_Joint_Optimization_of_Agent_Applications_and_TensorRT-LLM.md`:
- Line 216: The subsection heading currently reads "Batch Schedule" but the rest
of the doc uses "Batch Scheduling" (e.g., "Case Study 2: Batch Scheduling");
update the heading text to "Batch Scheduling" so terminology is consistent
across the document, locating and replacing the heading string "Batch Schedule"
in the markdown file (the line that currently starts with "### (II) Batch
Schedule") with "### (II) Batch Scheduling".
ℹ️ Review info
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (2)
docs/source/blogs/media/tech_blog17_open_deep_research_workflow.pngis excluded by!**/*.pngdocs/source/blogs/media/tech_blog17_queuing_delays.pngis excluded by!**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
docs/source/blogs/tech_blog/blog17_Joint_Optimization_of_Agent_Applications_and_TensorRT-LLM.md
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #41202 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
PR_Github #41202 [ run ] completed with state |
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #41597 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
PR_Github #41597 [ run ] completed with state
|
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #41622 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
PR_Github #41622 [ run ] completed with state
|
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #43466 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
PR_Github #43466 [ run ] completed with state
|
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #43497 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
PR_Github #43497 [ run ] completed with state |
Signed-off-by: Ryan Sun <rysun@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yisun0618@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yisun0618@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yisun0618@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Yi Sun <yisun0618@gmail.com>
|
/bot run |
|
PR_Github #48394 [ run ] triggered by Bot. Commit: |
|
PR_Github #48394 [ run ] completed with state |
Summary by CodeRabbit
Description
Test Coverage
PR Checklist
Please review the following before submitting your PR:
PR description clearly explains what and why. If using CodeRabbit's summary, please make sure it makes sense.
PR Follows TRT-LLM CODING GUIDELINES to the best of your knowledge.
Test cases are provided for new code paths (see test instructions)
Any new dependencies have been scanned for license and vulnerabilities
CODEOWNERS updated if ownership changes
Documentation updated as needed
Update tava architecture diagram if there is a significant design change in PR.
The reviewers assigned automatically/manually are appropriate for the PR.
Please check this after reviewing the above items as appropriate for this PR.
GitHub Bot Help
To see a list of available CI bot commands, please comment
/bot help.