Skip to content

fix(test-plan): update legacy control-plane IDs#483

Merged
abegnoche merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
abegnoche:fix/labels
Jun 29, 2026
Merged

fix(test-plan): update legacy control-plane IDs#483
abegnoche merged 1 commit into
NVIDIA:mainfrom
abegnoche:fix/labels

Conversation

@abegnoche

@abegnoche abegnoche commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Summary

  • Replace remaining legacy control-plane test IDs with stable catalog IDs in Nico wiring and coverage tests.
  • Update the control-plane suite comment to reference the stable access-key lifecycle IDs.

Test plan

  • Pre-commit hooks passed during commit, including test-plan coverage and suite checks.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified control-plane teardown notes for access-key lifecycle checks.
    • Standardized validation/test references to use consistent control-plane identifiers.
  • Tests
    • Updated coverage checks to match the revised validation identifiers, keeping existing behavior unchanged.

Replace remaining legacy control-plane IDs in Nico wiring, comments, and coverage tests so they align with the stable test-plan catalog.

Signed-off-by: Alexandre Begnoche <abegnoche@nvidia.com>
@abegnoche abegnoche requested a review from a team as a code owner June 26, 2026 18:35
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jun 26, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 5984c082-72b3-4c62-82cf-993f87e3661c

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ef3e600 and 1a35864.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • isvctl/configs/providers/nico/config/control-plane.yaml
  • isvctl/configs/suites/control-plane.yaml
  • scripts/tests/test_test_plan_coverage.py

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The PR replaces placeholder control-plane test IDs with specific CP references in provider config, test coverage input, and suite teardown guidance. The access-key teardown comment now names the create and disable checks explicitly.

Changes

Control-plane test ID renumbering

Layer / File(s) Summary
Canonical ID values
isvctl/configs/providers/nico/config/control-plane.yaml, scripts/tests/test_test_plan_coverage.py
The provider FieldValueCheck and the coverage test input now use CP03-01 and CP07-01 instead of placeholder IDs.
Teardown comment update
isvctl/configs/suites/control-plane.yaml
The delete_access_key teardown comment now references CP05-01 and CP06-01 for the access-key create/disable flow.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Possibly related PRs

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly matches the PR’s main change: replacing legacy control-plane IDs with stable catalog IDs.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed Docstring coverage is 100.00% which is sufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@github-actions

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔐 TruffleHog Secret Scan

No secrets or credentials found!

Your code has been scanned for 700+ types of secrets and credentials. All clear! 🎉

🔗 View scan details

🕐 Last updated: 2026-06-26 18:36:39 UTC | Commit: 1a35864

@abegnoche abegnoche merged commit 6fe807b into NVIDIA:main Jun 29, 2026
7 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants