Skip to content

doc: fix stride typo in layout algebra composition example #3186

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
leonardHONG wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
+1 −1
Open

doc: fix stride typo in layout algebra composition example #3186

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion media/docs/cpp/cute/02_layout_algebra.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -151,7 +151,7 @@ For example,
* `(3,6,2,8) / 9 => (1,2,2,8)`
* `(3,6,2,8) / 72 => (1,1,1,4)`

To compute the strides of the strided layout, the residues of the above operation are used to scale the strides of `A`. For instance, the last example `(3,6,2,8):(w,x,y,z) / 72` with strides `(w,x,y,z)` produces `(72*w,24*x,4*x,2*z)` as the strides of the strided layout.
To compute the strides of the strided layout, the residues of the above operation are used to scale the strides of `A`. For instance, the last example `(3,6,2,8):(w,x,y,z) / 72` with strides `(w,x,y,z)` produces `(72*w,24*x,4*y,2*z)` as the strides of the strided layout.

As you may have noticed, we can only divide shapes by certain values and get a sensible result. This is called the **stride divisibility condition** and is statically checked in CuTe when possible.

Expand Down