Fix #139, Improved performance by removing memory leak caused by high…#163
Closed
nelsonomuto wants to merge 1 commit intoNarrativeScience-old:masterfrom
Closed
Fix #139, Improved performance by removing memory leak caused by high…#163nelsonomuto wants to merge 1 commit intoNarrativeScience-old:masterfrom
nelsonomuto wants to merge 1 commit intoNarrativeScience-old:masterfrom
Conversation
… leak caused by high message cap
Collaborator
|
Thanks for this, v0.4.3 is a full rewrite and thus won't exhibit this exact issue. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Something that I noticed works quite well and improves performance is changing the client message_cap to a lower number. For example I changed it to 1 and it really boosted performance, the difference was night and day.
Even at 200,000 messages there is no lag at all when the message_cap variable is reduced to 1!
As opposed to before with the previous cap at 5000 the page started crawling at ~ 20,000 messages and browser freezing at ~ 70,000 messages.
I analyzed the code and I don't see any use for having a larger message_cap, at least not in the current tag v0.3.4. My assumption is this is left over from a legacy feature. Otherwise, keeping the LogMessages backbone collection as small as possible tremendously improved the usability.
client.coffee line 26 v0.3.4
MESSAGE_CAP = 1